IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i23-24p3240-3248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Women's understandings of sexual problems: findings from an in‐depth interview study

Author

Listed:
  • Gary Bellamy
  • Merryn Gott
  • Sharron Hinchliff

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore women's understandings of sexual problems. Background Prevailing knowledge about women's sexual problems has prioritised the material body. Particular attention is given to the importance of penetrative sexual intercourse, orgasm and the reproductive imperative, which fail to take account of contextual factors that contribute to women's experiences of sexual problems. Design Qualitative in‐depth interview study. Methods Individual in‐depth interviews conducted with 23 women aged 23–72 years, recruited from members of the general public and a psychosexual clinic. Results The findings suggest that sexual problems are bodily experienced and socially and psychologically mediated. Women's views were influenced by the relational context of their experiences. At the same time, their views were deeply embedded within a patriarchal framework to make sense of their own sexual functioning and satisfaction. Conclusion This study presents a challenge in the drive to medicalise women's sexual problems via the female sexual dysfunction label. It problematises the current diagnostic criteria for sexual problems outlined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, which presupposes a highly individualised framework and favours a more nuanced approach. Relevance to clinical practice Rather than adopting or eschewing an entirely medical or psychosocial model, women presenting with sexual problems should be seen by a clinician whose assessment is holistic and takes into account relational, cultural, psychosocial and health‐related concerns.

Suggested Citation

  • Gary Bellamy & Merryn Gott & Sharron Hinchliff, 2013. "Women's understandings of sexual problems: findings from an in‐depth interview study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(23-24), pages 3240-3248, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:23-24:p:3240-3248
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12081
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12081?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:23-24:p:3240-3248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.