IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i21-22p3109-3119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Safe enough in here?’: patients' expectations and experiences of feeling safe in an acute psychiatric inpatient ward

Author

Listed:
  • Rosemary C Stenhouse

Abstract

Aims and objectives To understand the experience of being a patient on an acute psychiatric inpatient ward. Background Acute psychiatric inpatient care is an integral part of the mental health system. A key driver for admission to acute wards is risk. Previous research indicates that people do not always feel safe when in an acute ward. Understanding the patient experience of safety can influence nursing practice, as well as policy and service development. Design A qualitative approach was used. Patient experience was conceptualised as represented through narrative as data. Sociolinguistic theories linking narrative structure with meaning informed the development of the analytic framework. Methods Thirteen patients with a variety of diagnoses were recruited from an acute ward. Unstructured interviews were carried out in participants' homes two and six weeks postdischarge. Holistic analysis of each individual's data set was undertaken. Themes running across these holistic analyses were then identified and developed. Results Participant narratives were focused around themes of help, safety and power. This study presents findings relating to the experience of safety. Participants expected to be safe from themselves and from others. Initially, they experienced a sense of safety from the outside world. Lack of knowledge of their fellow patients made them feel vulnerable. Participants expected the nurses to keep them safe, and felt safer when there were male nurses present. Conclusions Participants talk about safety in terms of psychological and physical safety. A key issue was the perception of threat from other patients, highlighting the need to consider patient safety as more than physical safety. Relevance to practice Nurses need to be sensitive to the possibility that patients feel unsafe in the absence of obvious threat. Institutional structures that challenge patients' sense of safety must be examined.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosemary C Stenhouse, 2013. "‘Safe enough in here?’: patients' expectations and experiences of feeling safe in an acute psychiatric inpatient ward," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(21-22), pages 3109-3119, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:21-22:p:3109-3119
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12111
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12111?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Natalie Ann Cutler & Jenny Sim & Elizabeth Halcomb & Lorna Moxham & Moira Stephens, 2020. "Nurses' influence on consumers' experience of safety in acute mental health units: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(21-22), pages 4379-4386, November.
    2. Natalie Ann Cutler & Elizabeth Halcomb & Jenny Sim & Moira Stephens & Lorna Moxham, 2021. "How does the environment influence consumers' perceptions of safety in acute mental health units? A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5-6), pages 765-772, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:21-22:p:3109-3119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.