IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i21-22p3095-3108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Children's and parents’ perceptions of postoperative pain management: a mixed methods study

Author

Listed:
  • Alison Twycross
  • G Allen Finley

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore children's and parents' perceptions about the quality of postoperative pain management. Background Children continue to experience moderate to severe pain postoperatively. Unrelieved pain has short‐ and long‐term undesirable consequences. Thus, it is important to ensure pain is managed effectively. Little research has explored children's and parents' perceptions of pain management. Design Exploratory study. Methods Children (n = 8) were interviewed about their perceptions of pain care using the draw‐and‐write technique or a semi‐structured format and asked to rate the worst pain experienced postoperatively on a numerical scale. Parents (n = 10) were asked to complete the Information About Pain questionnaire. Data were collected in 2011. Results Most children experienced moderate to severe pain postoperatively. Children reported being asked about their pain, receiving pain medication and using nonpharmacological methods of pain relief. A lack of preoperative preparation was evident for some children. Most parents indicated they had received information on their child's pain management. Generally, participants were satisfied with care. Conclusion Participants appeared satisfied with the care provided despite experiencing moderate to severe pain. This may be attributable to beliefs that nurses would do everything they could to relieve pain and that some pain is to be expected postsurgery. Relevance to clinical practice Children are still experiencing moderate to severe pain postoperatively. Given the possible short‐ and long‐term consequences of unrelieved pain, this is of concern. Knowledge translation models may support the use of evidence in practice, and setting a pain goal with parents and children may help improve care.

Suggested Citation

  • Alison Twycross & G Allen Finley, 2013. "Children's and parents’ perceptions of postoperative pain management: a mixed methods study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(21-22), pages 3095-3108, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:21-22:p:3095-3108
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12152
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12152?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jackie Vasey & Joanna Smith & Marilynne N. Kirshbaum & Kathleen Chirema, 2019. "Tokenism or true partnership: Parental involvement in a child’s acute pain care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1491-1505, May.
    2. Anja Hetland Smeland & Tone Rustøen & Torgun Næss & Lill Nybro & Stefan Lundeberg & Hanne Reinertsen & Trond H. Diseth & Alison Twycross, 2019. "Children’s views on postsurgical pain in recovery units in Norway: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(11-12), pages 2157-2170, June.
    3. Jenny Edmonds & Alison Twycross, 2018. "Mothers’ experiences of managing their child's pain before and during attendance at the emergency department," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(9-10), pages 2003-2013, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:21-22:p:3095-3108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.