IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i21-22p3016-3023.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sexual function in Iranian women using different methods of contraception

Author

Listed:
  • Ghadirian Fataneh
  • Mardani H Marjan
  • Rezaee Nasrin
  • Taghavi Taraneh

Abstract

Aims and objectives To determine the sexual function in Iranian women using different methods of contraception. Background Failure in family planning programmes can lead to reduced quality of life and threaten the health of the families in developing countries. One of the major causes of failure in family planning methods could be due to complications of them. One of the major unpleasant side effects of these methods, as an important cause of the rejection, is sexual dysfunction. Design A case–control study. Methods In this study, samples included 608 married women aged 15–49 years from Shahin Shahr health centres in Isfahan. Stratified sampling method was used to determine entitlement to select health centres, and convenience sampling method was used for women selection. The selected samples, based on using contraceptive methods, were divided into case group (n = 306) and control group (n = 302). Data were collected using sexual function questionnaire in women using different methods of contraception. Data were analysed by descriptive statistic and anova. Results Results of independent t‐test showed significant difference in all domains of sexual function in two groups (p

Suggested Citation

  • Ghadirian Fataneh & Mardani H Marjan & Rezaee Nasrin & Taghavi Taraneh, 2013. "Sexual function in Iranian women using different methods of contraception," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(21-22), pages 3016-3023, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:21-22:p:3016-3023
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12289
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12289
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12289?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:21-22:p:3016-3023. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.