IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i17-18p2648-2657.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The relationship of individual characteristics, perceived worksite support and perceived creativity to clinical nurses' innovative outcome

Author

Listed:
  • Hsiu‐Min Tsai
  • Shwu‐Ru Liou
  • Ya‐Chu Hsiao
  • Ching‐Yu Cheng

Abstract

Aims and objectives To understand the relationship of individual characteristics, perceived worksite support and perceived personal creativity to clinical nurses' innovative outcome (receiving the Nursing Innovation Award). Background Since the idea of applying creativity and innovation to clinical nursing practice and management was first advocated in the Nursing Administration Quarterly in 1982, the topic of nursing innovation has gained worldwide attention. To increase the prevalence of nursing innovation, it is important to identify and understand the related factors that influence nurses' innovative outcome. Design This study used a cross‐sectional descriptive survey design. Methods A self‐administered questionnaire was completed by 32 award winners and 506 nonawarded clinical nurses in Taiwan. Results The level of creativity perceived by all participants was moderate‐to‐high. Individual characteristics (r = 0·61) and worksite support (r = 0·27) were both correlated with perceived creativity. Individual characteristics and worksite support showed some correlation as well (r = 0·21). Individual characteristics and worksite support could predict perceived creativity after controlling for demographic variables, but only individual characteristics had an effect on innovative outcome. Perceived creativity did not have mediation effects either between individual characteristics and innovative outcome or between worksite support and innovative outcome. Conclusions Clinical nurses' individual characteristics had a direct relationship to innovative outcome, whereas neither worksite support nor creativity was correlated with innovative outcome. Although worksite support did not show effects on innovative outcome, it was related to both perceived creativity and individual characteristics. As suggested by other scholars, there might be other related factors between creativity and innovative outcome. Relevance to clinical practice Although worksite support did not have effect on clinical nurses' innovative outcome, it was related to individual characteristics. Hospital administrators or nursing directors can foster a supportive environment where creative nurses would be more likely to work and engage in innovative activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Hsiu‐Min Tsai & Shwu‐Ru Liou & Ya‐Chu Hsiao & Ching‐Yu Cheng, 2013. "The relationship of individual characteristics, perceived worksite support and perceived creativity to clinical nurses' innovative outcome," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(17-18), pages 2648-2657, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:17-18:p:2648-2657
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12269
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12269?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:17-18:p:2648-2657. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.