Author
Listed:
- Susanna Ågren
- Lorraine S Evangelista
- Thomas Davidson
- Anna Strömberg
Abstract
Aims and objectives. This randomised controlled trial was conducted to estimate the cost‐effectiveness of a nurse‐led education and psychosocial support programme for patients with heart failure (HF) and their partners. Background. There are few studies evaluating cost‐effectiveness of interventions among HF patient–partner dyads. Methods. Dyads randomised to the experimental group received nurse‐led counselling, computer‐based education and written materials aimed at developing problem‐solving skills at two, six and 12 weeks after hospitalisation with HF exacerbation. The dyads in the control group received usual care. A cost‐effectiveness analysis that included costs associated with staff time to deliver the intervention and travel costs was conducted at 12 months. Quality‐adjusted life‐year (QALY) weights for patients and partners were estimated by SF‐6D. Results. A total of 155 dyads were included. The intervention cost was €223 per patient. Participants in both groups showed improvements in QALY weights after 12 months. However, no significant difference in QALY weights was found between the patients in the two groups, nor among their partners. Conclusion. The intervention was not proven cost‐effective, neither for patients nor for partners. The intervention, however, had trends (but not significant) effects on the patient–partner dyads, and by analysing the QALY gained from the dyad, a reasonable mean cost‐effectiveness ratio was achieved. Relevance to clinical practice. The study shows trends of a cost‐effective education and psychosocial care of HF patient–partner dyads.
Suggested Citation
Susanna Ågren & Lorraine S Evangelista & Thomas Davidson & Anna Strömberg, 2013.
"Cost‐effectiveness of a nurse‐led education and psychosocial programme for patients with chronic heart failure and their partners,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(15-16), pages 2347-2353, August.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:15-16:p:2347-2353
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04246.x
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:15-16:p:2347-2353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.