IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i13-14p1827-1832.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The validation and application of the Chinese version of perceived nursing work environment scale

Author

Listed:
  • Peng Zhao
  • Fen Ju Chen
  • Xiao Hui Jia
  • Hui Lv
  • Piao Piao Cheng
  • Li Ping Zhang

Abstract

Aims and objectives To improve the development of the Chinese version of Perceived Nursing Work Environment (C‐PNWE) scale by examination and application and to explore the nurses' perception of their working environment in a hospital. Background The C‐PNWE scale was translated and revised from the PNWE scale. The least of perfection is that the development of C‐PNWE ignored that the psychometric properties of the PNWE instrument were established of critical care nurses and further application and testing of the PNWE in various patient care settings were recommended. Design This is a cross‐sectional design. Nurses from different departments of a hospital were sampled by convenience sampling and investigated by self‐administrated questionnaire. Methods Data obtained through questionnaires were analysed by descriptive statistical analyses and profile analyses using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Chinese version 17.0 software. Results The coincident and level profile analyses indicated that these groups can merge into one group, and the profile of measurement result of this merged group would not exhibit flatness. Among six dimensions of C‐PNWE scale, the Staffing and Resource Adequacy got the lowest average score. Among 41 items, ‘Opportunity for staff nurse to participate in policy decisions’ got the lowest mean. Conclusions The C‐PNWE scale shows good psychometric properties and can be used to explore nurses' perspectives of the nursing practice environment in China. And the situation of nurses' perceived working environment in China needs further study. Relevance to clinical practice Shaping nursing practice environments to promote desired outcomes requires valid and reliable measures to assess practice environments prior to, during and following efforts to implement change. The C‐PNWE scale can be a useful measurement tool for administrators to improve the nursing work environment in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Peng Zhao & Fen Ju Chen & Xiao Hui Jia & Hui Lv & Piao Piao Cheng & Li Ping Zhang, 2013. "The validation and application of the Chinese version of perceived nursing work environment scale," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(13-14), pages 1827-1832, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:13-14:p:1827-1832
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12229
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12229?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:13-14:p:1827-1832. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.