IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i11-12p1531-1538.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of a tool to describe the role of the clinical nurse consultant in Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Margaret Fry
  • Christine Duffield
  • Richard Baldwin
  • Michael Roche
  • Helen Stasa
  • Annette Solman

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To develop a tool for defining and measuring the role characteristics and responsibilities of an advanced practice nursing role in Australia. Background. Internationally, there is considerable confusion about the precise role responsibilities of advanced practice nursing positions. In Australia, the clinical nurse consultant is an advanced practice role with five nominated domains of practice. However, there are no tools for measuring the performance of clinical nurse consultants against the listed domains. Design and methods. Participants were 56 clinical nurse consultants at a tertiary public hospital. The existing literature, an online survey, and position descriptions were used to generate the a priori themes for the initial template. Semi‐structured interviews were conducted (in 2010) to test the template characteristics. The template underwent multiple iterations in its development. Results. A 50‐item tool was devised, which consisted of five domains with a ten‐point hierarchical scale within each domain. In preliminary testing, the revised template was found to provide greater clarity regarding roles and grades than the original position descriptions. Conclusions. Further testing and refinement of the modified rating scale is needed, but it offers the possibility of a new tool that can be used by health service managers to determine the grade of a clinical nurse consultant position and for evaluating role performance. Relevance to clinical practice. This preliminary study suggests that the tool provides a useful means of measuring advanced nursing practice and responsibilities across different domains and levels of appointment. The tool may be able to be adapted for use with other advanced practice nursing roles both within Australia and internationally.

Suggested Citation

  • Margaret Fry & Christine Duffield & Richard Baldwin & Michael Roche & Helen Stasa & Annette Solman, 2013. "Development of a tool to describe the role of the clinical nurse consultant in Australia," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(11-12), pages 1531-1538, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:11-12:p:1531-1538
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04264.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04264.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04264.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Roche & Christine Duffield & Sarah Wise & Richard Baldwin & Margaret Fry & Annette Solman, 2013. "Domains of practice and Advanced Practice Nursing in Australia," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 497-503, December.
    2. Judy Mannix & Lesley Wilkes & John Daly, 2015. "‘Good ethics and moral standing’: a qualitative study of aesthetic leadership in clinical nursing practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(11-12), pages 1603-1610, June.
    3. Michelle Giles & Vicki Parker & Jane Conway & Rebecca Mitchell, 2018. "Knowing how to get things done: Nurse consultants as clinical leaders," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(9-10), pages 1981-1993, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:11-12:p:1531-1538. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.