IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i1-2p168-179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding acute care nurse practitioner communication and decision‐making in healthcare teams

Author

Listed:
  • Kelley Kilpatrick

Abstract

Aims and objectives: This paper aims to describe communication and decision‐making in healthcare teams following the introduction of an acute care nurse practitioner role. Background: Healthcare teams need to establish clear processes for communication and decision‐making about patient care to be effective. Little is known about how acute care nurse practitioners affect these team processes. Design: Observational/descriptive study. Methods: Structured non‐participant observations of acute care nurse practitioners and healthcare team members during routine patient care activities were completed to identify the verbal and non‐verbal behaviours. Data were collected in two hospitals in one Canadian province from March–May 2009 for a total of 17 hours and 23 minutes. Descriptive statistics were generated. Results: Differences in communication and decision‐making were noted between the cases. The acute care nurse practitioners in Case 1 spoke most frequently with physicians when making patient care decisions while the acute care nurse practitioners in Case 2 spoke most frequently with the nurses. The acute care nurse practitioners needed to validate all patient care decisions if prescriptive authority had not been transferred to them. Discussion: Much of the potential of acute care nurse practitioner roles rests on the ability to enact the full scope of their role. Acute care nurse practitioner scope of practice depends on the legislation, the transfer of decision‐making authority in the organisation, and the messages received form the medical and nursing leadership group. Conclusions: This appears to be the first in‐depth description of communication and decision‐making in healthcare teams following the introduction of acute care nurse practitioners and furthers our understanding of how system‐level imperatives filter down to healthcare teams. Relevance to clinical practice: The transfer of prescriptive authority to acute care nurse practitioners affected communication and decision‐making and changed the way routine activities were conducted.

Suggested Citation

  • Kelley Kilpatrick, 2013. "Understanding acute care nurse practitioner communication and decision‐making in healthcare teams," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(1-2), pages 168-179, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:1-2:p:168-179
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04119.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04119.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04119.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gerard Fealy & Mary Casey & Daniela Rohde & Anne‐Marie Brady & Josephine Hegarty & Catriona Kennedy & Martin McNamara & Pauline O'Reilly & Geraldine Prizeman, 2015. "Scope of practice decision making: findings from a national survey of Irish nurses and midwives," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(19-20), pages 2871-2880, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:1-2:p:168-179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.