IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i1-2p159-167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Communication through in‐person interpreters: a qualitative study of home care providers' and social workers' views

Author

Listed:
  • Elisabeth B Brämberg
  • Lars Sandman

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe the experiences of home care providers and social workers in communication, via in‐person interpreters, with patients who do not share a common language, and to offer suggestions for practice based on this description. Background The use of interpreters is essential for successful communication to provide equal access to health care for patients not sharing a common language with care providers. Successful bilingual communication is probably even more complex within the home care services with its focus on medical treatment, care and daily support in relation to the more exclusive focus on medical treatment within hospital care. Design An explorative, qualitative, descriptive study. Methods Data were collected in seven focus group interviews. A total of 27 persons, working as registered nurses, assistant nurses and social workers in municipal home care, participated. The analysis was inspired by inductive content analysis. Results The results express a traditional view on interpretation where the in‐person interpreter is supposed to act to a greater or lesser extent as an objective and neutral conduit or communicator of what is said. The interpreter is also expected to observe when medical terms and other concepts need to be explained, which thus exceeds the basic role as a communicator of what was said. Conclusions This study emphasises the need to view the interpreter as an active and explicit party in a three‐way communication. Relevance to clinical practice Viewing the interpreter as an active and explicit party in a three‐way communication and as an essential part of the care team might reduce the possible threat to patient confidentiality, and could contribute to solve the problem of interpreting the patient's non‐verbal signs.

Suggested Citation

  • Elisabeth B Brämberg & Lars Sandman, 2013. "Communication through in‐person interpreters: a qualitative study of home care providers' and social workers' views," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(1-2), pages 159-167, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:1-2:p:159-167
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04312.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04312.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04312.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:1-2:p:159-167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.