IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i7-8p1178-1188.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurses’ assessments of individualised care in long‐term care institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Riitta Suhonen
  • Pilvi Alikleemola
  • Jouko Katajisto
  • Helena Leino‐Kilpi

Abstract

Aims. The aims of this study were to explore nurses’ assessments of individualised care in long‐term care wards and to examine how their sociodemographic variables were associated with their views of such care. Background. Although the importance of individualised care is highlighted both by nurses and by older people, there is a limited amount of research about individualised care, especially in the long‐term care of older people. Design. An exploratory design was employed. Methods. Data were collected using questionnaires [Individualised Care Scale (ICS)‐Nurse] from nurses (n = 283, n = 215, response rate 76%) working in the long‐term care wards (n = 19) of four institutions in 2009. Data were analysed statistically. Results. Overall, nurses perceived that they supported patient individuality during nursing activities but the care they provided was not so individualised. Nurses perceived that they supported older peoples’ individuality in the clinical situation and in decisional control over care well but supported older peoples’ individual life situation to a lesser extent. The higher the nurses’ age, the longer the working experience in health care or experience in the current ward, the more positive views they had about the support of individuality. Conclusions. This study identified some shortcomings in the realisation of individuality in the care of older people. Nurses seem to think they generally provide individualised care but this was not necessarily realised in the current evaluations of the care they delivered. Relevance to clinical practice. There is need to identify issues that may help in developing individualised care in clinical practice. Nurses’ attitude to older people in the geriatric care settings needs exploration. Nurses may focus on physiological needs that may hinder the recognition of older patient’s individuality.

Suggested Citation

  • Riitta Suhonen & Pilvi Alikleemola & Jouko Katajisto & Helena Leino‐Kilpi, 2012. "Nurses’ assessments of individualised care in long‐term care institutions," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(7‐8), pages 1178-1188, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:7-8:p:1178-1188
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03855.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03855.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03855.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:7-8:p:1178-1188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.