IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i5-6p833-840.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality geriatric care as perceived by nurses in long‐term and acute care settings

Author

Listed:
  • Beth Ellen Barba
  • Jie Hu
  • Jimmy Efird

Abstract

Aims and objectives. This study focused on differences in nurses’ satisfaction with the quality of care of older people and with organisational characteristics and work environment in acute care and long‐term care settings. Background. Numerous studies have explored links between nurses’ satisfaction with care and work environments on the one hand and a variety of physical, behavioural and psychological reactions of nurses on the other. One key to keeping nurses in the workplace is a better understanding of nurses’ satisfaction with the quality of care they provide. Design. Descriptive design. Method. The self‐selected sample included 298 registered nurses and licensed practical nurses who provide care to minority, underserved and disadvantaged older populations in 89 long‐term care and

Suggested Citation

  • Beth Ellen Barba & Jie Hu & Jimmy Efird, 2012. "Quality geriatric care as perceived by nurses in long‐term and acute care settings," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(5‐6), pages 833-840, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:5-6:p:833-840
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03781.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03781.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03781.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:5-6:p:833-840. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.