Author
Listed:
- Nurcan Ertuğ
- Saadet Ülker
Abstract
Aim and objectives. The aim of the research is to determine the effect of cold application on the pain owing to chest tube removal for patients with single pleural chest tube. Background. Removal of chest tubes causes patients to feel pain and interventions used for reducing the pain owing to the removal of chest tubes are not sufficient. Design. Controlled clinical trial with repeated measures. Methods. This study was conducted with 140 patients, of whom 70 patients were in the experimental group and 70 patients were in the control group, in a thoracic hospital in Turkey. Data were collected using a data collection form consisting of patients’ demographic and health history and Visual Analogue Scale. Cold was applied to patients in the experimental group prior to chest tube removal. In the experimental group, skin temperature and pain intensity was measured for each patient at four time points. In the control group, pain intensity was evaluated for each patient at three time points. Data were evaluated using Chi‐square and Repeated Measurements two‐way anova tests. Results. The Visual Analogue Scale score was measured immediately after the chest tube removal in the experimental group was 3·85, compared with 5·60 in the control group. There were significant differences on pain with cold application between the two groups prior and after the intervention. Age, gender, the number of days the chest tube was inserted and the chest tube insertion indication had no effect on the pain owing to chest tube removal. Conclusion. Cold application is effective in reducing the pain owing to chest tube removal. Relevance to clinical practice. Cold application was recommended prior to chest tube removal to reduce the pain owing to removal of chest tube.
Suggested Citation
Nurcan Ertuğ & Saadet Ülker, 2012.
"The effect of cold application on pain due to chest tube removal,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(5‐6), pages 784-790, March.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:5-6:p:784-790
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03955.x
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:5-6:p:784-790. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.