Author
Listed:
- Lisa Ring Jacobsson
- Maria Friedrichsen
- Anne Göransson
- Claes Hallert
Abstract
Aim and objective. To assess the effects of an active method of patient education on the psychological well‐being of women with coeliac disease in remission. Background. Despite remission with a gluten‐free diet, adults with coeliac disease and especially women experience a subjective poor health. Self‐management education seems to be promising tool to help patients suffering from coeliac disease to cope with their disorder. Design. A randomised controlled trial. Methods. A total of 106 women, ≥20 years, with confirmed coeliac disease, who had been on a gluten‐free diet for a minimum of five years. The intervention group (n = 54) underwent a 10‐session educational programme, ‘Coeliac School’, based on problem‐based learning. The controls (n = 52) received information regarding coeliac disease sent home on a regular basis. The primary outcomes were psychological general well‐being measured with a validated questionnaire. Results. Participants in the Coeliac School reported a significant improvement in psychological well‐being at 10 weeks, whereas the controls given usual care reported a worsening in psychological well‐being. After six months, a significant improvement remained for the index of vitality. Conclusions. Patient education increased psychological well‐being in women with coeliac disease. There is a need to refine the methods of patient education to make the effects of well‐being more pronounced over time. Relevance to clinical practice. Patient education using problem‐based learning promotes self‐management in coeliac disease by improving the well‐being of patients who have been struggling with the gluten‐free diet for years.
Suggested Citation
Lisa Ring Jacobsson & Maria Friedrichsen & Anne Göransson & Claes Hallert, 2012.
"Does a Coeliac School increase psychological well‐being in women suffering from coeliac disease, living on a gluten‐free diet?,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(5‐6), pages 766-775, March.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:5-6:p:766-775
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03953.x
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:5-6:p:766-775. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.