IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i3-4p564-572.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceptions of a life review programme among Chinese patients with advanced cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Huimin Xiao
  • Enid Kwong
  • Samantha Pang
  • Esther Mok

Abstract

Aims. The aim of this study was to elicit patients’ perceptions of their participation in a life review programme for Chinese patients with advanced cancer. Background. Empirical data have supported the suggestion that a life review is an effective psycho‐spiritual intervention, particularly with older people. However, no life review programmes have been specifically designed for Chinese patients with advanced cancer, and their views on the life review therefore remain unknown. Design. This study was a descriptive qualitative design. Method. In‐depth individual interviews were conducted with a sample of 26 patients with advanced cancer receiving home‐based palliative care from a hospice after the completion of the programme. Results. The six categories identified in the analysis were as follows: (1) accepting one’s unique life; (2) feelings of emotional relief; (3) bolstering a sense of meaning in life; (4) leaving a personal legacy; (5) making future orientations; and (6) barriers to a life review. Conclusion. Our life review programme is non‐invasive care intervention for improving the psycho‐spiritual well‐being of Chinese patients with advanced cancer and helping them to prepare for death. This programme not only provides Chinese nurses with a new approach to meeting the unique needs of patients approaching death but also poses a challenge to customary beliefs about death, which is considered a social taboo in China. Relevance to clinical practice. The life review programme can be integrated into the usual care arrangements to enhance the psycho‐spiritual well‐being of Chinese patients with advanced cancer. Nurses should be aware of the challenges involved in the process of conducting a life review.

Suggested Citation

  • Huimin Xiao & Enid Kwong & Samantha Pang & Esther Mok, 2012. "Perceptions of a life review programme among Chinese patients with advanced cancer," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(3‐4), pages 564-572, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:3-4:p:564-572
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03842.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03842.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03842.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cecilia W M Kwan & Marques S N Ng & Carmen W H Chan, 2017. "The use of life review to enhance spiritual well‐being in patients with terminal illnesses: An integrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4201-4211, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:3-4:p:564-572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.