IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i3-4p535-543.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Nice girls don’t’: women and the condom conundrum

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine Cook

Abstract

Aims and objectives. This study aims to highlight the tensions between the ‘risks’ of condom negotiation to feminine identity and safer sex health education messages of individual choice and responsibility. Effective education incorporates nurses’ recognition that deterrents to women practising safer sex may increase subsequent to a diagnosis of a viral sexually transmitted infection. Background. Health educational messages and clinicians’ teaching emphasise rational decision‐making with regard to condom use with a focus on the acquisition of technical information and ready access to condoms. These messages do not take into account the social complexities for women in negotiating condom use with men that deter condom use. Design. A qualitative, feminist post‐structuralist research design was used. Methods. In‐depth email interviews were conducted with 12 clinicians with expertise in the sexual health field and 26 women with a diagnosis of either herpes simplex virus or human papilloma virus. A thematic analysis approach was used to analyse the semi‐structured and interactive interviews. Results. Few women in the study had received any direct safer sex education from clinicians and wanted them to initiate this discussion. Most women found the topic of safer sex became more difficult once diagnosed with a viral sexually transmitted infection. Women’s dilemmas were whether to disclose the diagnosis as part of insisting on condom use, whether condom use mitigated the obligation to disclose or whether any talk or condom use was avoided as too ‘risky’ to feminine identity. Conclusion. Paradoxically, it may be harder for women to negotiate safer sex and ask for condoms to be used, once diagnosed with a viral sexually transmitted infection. Women want clinicians to give advice about the dissonance between ‘rational’ safer sex messages and social expectations of appropriate femininity. Relevance to clinical practice. Nurses have a key role in engaging with women in considering safer sex practices. Nurses need to be able to demonstrate to women that they understand the complexities of the ‘real‐life’ barriers to acting on sexual health education messages, including an awareness of power in gender relations.

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine Cook, 2012. "‘Nice girls don’t’: women and the condom conundrum," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(3‐4), pages 535-543, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:3-4:p:535-543
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03879.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03879.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03879.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:3-4:p:535-543. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.