IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i21-22p3276-3286.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A survey of parental self‐efficacy experiences: maximising potential through health visiting and universal parenting support

Author

Listed:
  • Karen A Whittaker
  • Sarah Cowley

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To examine parental self‐efficacy experiences for users of a parenting support programme and consider the pertinence of self‐efficacy theory to health visiting (public health nursing) practice. Background. Commonly, successful parenting training programmes are underpinned by social learning principles and aim to strengthen parental self‐efficacy. However, research examining programme effectiveness rarely discusses how self‐efficacy outcomes are achieved. Design. A descriptive survey was completed as the first part of a realistic evaluation study examining how a UK parenting support programme worked. Methods. The first part of the realistic evaluation involved validating outcome measures (the Parenting Self‐Agency Measure and Self‐Efficacy for Parenting Tasks Index subscales) and administering a questionnaire survey. The questionnaire was completed by adults accessing a parenting support programme during a 10‐month period (n = 168). Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results. Women were the main users of the programme, which included informal drop‐in groups as well as more formalised health visiting services and parenting training courses. The Parenting Self‐Agency Measure results indicated good general parental self‐efficacy; however, the task‐specific Self‐Efficacy for Parenting Tasks Indexes scales suggested that parents were less self‐efficacious in disciplining children. Lower self‐efficacy scores correlated with high ratings for ‘feeling tired’, ‘receiving negative comments’ and ‘giving‐in to a child’s demands’. Conclusions. Study results indicate that the domain general and task‐specific measures provide different, but helpful, insights into parental self‐efficacy experiences. By identifying factors associated with the levels of general and task‐specific parental self‐efficacy, health visitors can gain a fuller appreciation of support needs. Relevance to practice. To maximise potential through parenting support, attention should be given to addressing factors associated with poorer self‐efficacy experiences, including parental tiredness. Equally, practice should be directed at developing community environments that offer exposure to positive praise and the opportunity to practice new skills without facing criticism.

Suggested Citation

  • Karen A Whittaker & Sarah Cowley, 2012. "A survey of parental self‐efficacy experiences: maximising potential through health visiting and universal parenting support," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(21-22), pages 3276-3286, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:21-22:p:3276-3286
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04074.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04074.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04074.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lingling Huang & Qu Shen & Qiyu Fang & Xujuan Zheng, 2021. "Effects of Internet-Based Support Program on Parenting Outcomes for Primiparous Women: A Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-10, April.
    2. Lee Greenblatt-Kimron & Miri Kestler-Peleg & Ahuva Even-Zohar & Osnat Lavenda, 2021. "Death Anxiety and Loneliness among Older Adults: Role of Parental Self-Efficacy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-11, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:21-22:p:3276-3286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.