IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i21-22p3070-3081.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interventions for preventing and reducing the use of physical restraints in long‐term geriatric care – a Cochrane review

Author

Listed:
  • Ralph Möhler
  • Tanja Richter
  • Sascha Köpke
  • Gabriele Meyer

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to prevent and reduce the use of physical restraints in older people requiring long‐term nursing care. Background. Physical restraints are commonly used in geriatric long‐term care. However, they are associated with adverse outcomes. Therefore, freedom from physical restraints should be the aim of high‐quality nursing care. Design. Systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Methods. This review followed the methods of the Cochrane Handbook of systematic reviews of interventions. The systematic search (September 2009) covered the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group’s Specialized Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and LILACS. Results. Six cluster‐randomised controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. All studies investigated educational approaches targeting nursing staff. In addition, two studies offered consultation, two guidance and one support and free access to technical aids. Five studies examined nursing home residents and one study residents in group dwelling units. No studies in community settings were included. Overall, the methodological quality of studies was low. Their results were inconsistent. One study with good methodological quality in the nursing home setting documented an increase in physical restraints use in both groups, while the other four studies with lower quality found reduced use of physical restraints in the intervention group. The single study in group dwelling units found no change in physical restraints use in the intervention group but a significant increase in the control group. Conclusions. There is insufficient evidence supporting the effectiveness of educational interventions targeting nursing staff for preventing or reducing the use of physical restraints in geriatric long‐term care. Relevance to clinical practice. Our findings indicate that educational programmes targeting nursing staff might not be effective in reducing the use of physical restraints in geriatric long‐term care. It remains unclear which components should be included in educational programmes aiming to reduce physical restraints.

Suggested Citation

  • Ralph Möhler & Tanja Richter & Sascha Köpke & Gabriele Meyer, 2012. "Interventions for preventing and reducing the use of physical restraints in long‐term geriatric care – a Cochrane review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(21-22), pages 3070-3081, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:21-22:p:3070-3081
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04153.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04153.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04153.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jens Abraham & Julian Hirt & Friederike Kamm & Ralph Möhler, 2020. "Interventions to reduce physical restraints in general hospital settings: A scoping review of components and characteristics," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(17-18), pages 3183-3200, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:21-22:p:3070-3081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.