IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i19pt20p2930-2939.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing a Nursing‐Specific Model of Electronic Patient Record documentation with regard to information completeness, comprehensiveness and consistency

Author

Listed:
  • Gunn von Krogh
  • Dagfinn Nåden
  • Olaf Gjerløw Aasland

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To present the results from the test site application of the documentation model KPO (quality assurance, problem solving and caring) designed to impact the quality of nursing information in electronic patient record (EPR). Background. The KPO model was developed by means of consensus group and clinical testing. Four documentation arenas and eight content categories, nursing terminologies and a decision‐support system were designed to impact the completeness, comprehensiveness and consistency of nursing information. Design. The testing was performed in a pre‐test/post‐test time series design, three times at a one‐year interval. Methods. Content analysis of nursing documentation was accomplished through the identification, interpretation and coding of information units. Data from the pre‐test and post‐test 2 were subjected to statistical analyses. To estimate the differences, paired t‐tests were used. Results. At post‐test 2, the information is found to be more complete, comprehensive and consistent than at pre‐test. Conclusions. The findings indicate that documentation arenas combining work flow and content categories deduced from theories on nursing practice can influence the quality of nursing information. Relevance to clinical practice. The KPO model can be used as guide when shifting from paper‐based to electronic‐based nursing documentation with the aim of obtaining complete, comprehensive and consistent nursing information.

Suggested Citation

  • Gunn von Krogh & Dagfinn Nåden & Olaf Gjerløw Aasland, 2012. "Testing a Nursing‐Specific Model of Electronic Patient Record documentation with regard to information completeness, comprehensiveness and consistency," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(19pt20), pages 2930-2939, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:19pt20:p:2930-2939
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04185.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04185.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04185.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:19pt20:p:2930-2939. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.