Mental health placements in a general health setting: no substitute for the real thing!

Aim. To determine effectiveness of clinical placements in non‐mental health facilities in producing improvement in attitudes toward people with a mental illness and toward mental health nursing in nursing students. Background. Clinical placements in mental health settings have favourably impacted students’ attitudes and confidence in mental health settings. Placement shortages have created discussion about using non‐mental health settings to gain this experience, as mental illness is common in all health settings. To date, no research findings support or refute the efficacy of non‐mental health settings in influencing confidence and attitudes. Design. A within‐subject design was used. Participants provided self‐report data soon after the beginning and at the conclusion of the mental health component. Methods. A questionnaire was administered to a cohort of undergraduate nursing students (n = 66) to measure attitudes, preparedness for practice and interest in mental health nursing as a career, using a pre‐ and post‐test design. Results. Only 25% of participants completed clinical experience in a mental health facility. Minor improvement in attitudes, confidence and appreciating the nursing role in mental health were identified, but the impact on attitudes was considerably less favourable than when clinical experience was undertaken in a mental health facility. Conclusion. Participants who completed clinical experience in a non‐mental health facility did not demonstrate more favourable views about mental health nursing. Relevance to clinical practice. Clinical placements in mental health are essential preparation for undergraduate students to maximise improvement in attitudes to the care of people diagnosed with a mental illness and to mental health nursing.