IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i11-12p1706-1715.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An exploratory study on baccalaureate‐prepared nurses’ perceptions regarding clinical decision‐making in mainland China

Author

Listed:
  • Yue Wang
  • Wai‐Tong Chien
  • Sheila Twinn

Abstract

Aims. To explore Chinese baccalaureate‐prepared nurses’ perceptions of the concept and practices of clinical decision‐making. Background. Clinical decision‐making is an integral part of nursing practice. Several studies have explored the experiences and factors which influence nurses’ clinical decisions and these have recognised the cultural impact. However, little is known about the experience of clinical decision‐making from the perspective of Chinese baccalaureate‐prepared nurses. Design. A qualitative, exploratory study. Method. Data were obtained through in‐depth, semi‐structured interview with a convenience sample of 12 baccalaureate‐prepared registered nurses. Interviews focused on registered nurses’ understanding and perceptions of clinical decision‐making in clinical practice. They were tape‐recorded, transcribed verbatim and content analysed. Results. Two major themes were identified, namely, functional perspectives of clinical decision‐making and perceived autonomy in clinical decision‐making. There were two sub‐themes for the first theme: emphasising a full understanding of the patient’s health status and undertaking appropriate nursing judgements and problem‐solving. Three sub‐themes emerged for perceived autonomy in clinical decision‐making: relying on a doctor’s instructions, making judgements on a doctor’s orders and making decisions independently in emergency care. Conclusions. The findings indicate that Chinese nurses understand the essence of clinical decision‐making, but they have low autonomy in such decisions in their daily practice. More importantly, the results also reveal the importance of social and cultural factors in nurses’ perceptions of this topic. Relevance to clinical practice. A better understanding of the perceptions and concepts of clinical decision‐making among nurses in mainland China and other countries as well, can help in establishing nurses’ roles and responsibilities in participating in making effective decisions for patient care. The findings can also inform us of potential strategies which may be adopted to develop the knowledge and skills of Chinese baccalaureate‐prepared nursing students and graduates in making autonomous and accurate clinical decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Yue Wang & Wai‐Tong Chien & Sheila Twinn, 2012. "An exploratory study on baccalaureate‐prepared nurses’ perceptions regarding clinical decision‐making in mainland China," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(11‐12), pages 1706-1715, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:11-12:p:1706-1715
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03925.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03925.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03925.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shiah‐Lian Chen & Hsiu‐Ying Hsu & Chin‐Fu Chang & Esther Ching‐Lan Lin, 2016. "An exploration of the correlates of nurse practitioners’ clinical decision‐making abilities," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(7-8), pages 1016-1024, April.
    2. Sunyoung Oh & Minkyung Gu & Sohyune Sok, 2022. "A Concept Analysis of Nurses’ Clinical Decision Making: Implications for Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-12, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:11-12:p:1706-1715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.