Author
Listed:
- Ching‐Yun Yu
- Chich‐Hsiu Hung
- Te‐Fu Chan
- Ching‐Hsueh Yeh
- Chien‐Yu Lai
Abstract
Aims and objectives. This study aims to assess expectant fathers’ social support, marital intimacy and health status during the third trimester of their partners’ pregnancies. Further, we investigate the predictors of father–infant attachment after childbirth. Background. Becoming a father is a transition. Research has focused more on mothers than on fathers, even though the philosophy of the maternal care system is about providing family‐centred care. The psychological status of first‐time fathers and the attachment they have to their infants have received little attention in the research. Design. A repeated measures study design. Methods. A total of 195 first‐time fathers were recruited during the third trimester of their partners’ pregnancies. During that time, they completed the Social Support Scale, the Marital Intimacy Scale and the Chinese Health Questionnaire. After childbirth, they completed the Paternal Attachment Inventory during the one‐week postpartum period. Results. The fathers who perceived more marital intimacy and support from their partners were more attached to their infants. Moreover, marital intimacy and partner support were important predictors for father–infant attachment. Conclusions. Future research is warranted to determine the prenatal predictors of father–infant attachment for high‐risk families. Relevance to clinical practice. The philosophy of maternal care is family oriented; for health professionals, pregnancy is an important time to provide information and counsel couples. Interventions should not only target the health and well‐being of expectant mothers but should also actively invite fathers to participate in prenatal care with their partners to facilitate marital intimacy and father–infant attachment.
Suggested Citation
Ching‐Yun Yu & Chich‐Hsiu Hung & Te‐Fu Chan & Ching‐Hsueh Yeh & Chien‐Yu Lai, 2012.
"Prenatal predictors for father–infant attachment after childbirth,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(11‐12), pages 1577-1583, June.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:11-12:p:1577-1583
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.04003.x
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:11-12:p:1577-1583. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.