IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i1-2p139-148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Baby oil therapy for uremic pruritus in haemodialysis patients

Author

Listed:
  • Tzu‐Chen Lin
  • Yu‐Hung Lai
  • Su‐Er Guo
  • Chin‐Fang Liu
  • Jer‐Chia Tsai
  • How‐Ran Guo
  • Hsin‐Tien Hsu

Abstract

Aims. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of chilled/un‐chilled baby oil therapy for treating uremic pruritus in haemodialysis patients. Background. Uremic pruritus affects 50–90% of haemodialysis patients, which makes it one of the most common medical problems in this population. Pruritus can cause skin infection, desquamation, pathological skin change, sleep disorder, anxiety, depression and social dysfunction. Design. A prospective, pretest—post‐test quasi‐experimental design was used. Methods. Haemodialysis patients with uremic pruritus were recruited and randomly assigned to one of three groups: experimental group 1 (chilled baby oil treatment; n = 30), experimental group 2 (un‐chilled baby oil treatment; n = 31) and a control group (routine care only; n = 32). Participants in experimental group 1 and experimental group 2 were treated with chilled and un‐chilled baby oil, respectively, for 15 minutes at least once daily for three weeks. The control group received no intervention other than standard care. Data collection included demographic data and itch severity. Medical records were also reviewed. Results. The baseline characteristics of subjects in this study were as follows: 59% were male, mean age was 61·88 (SD 12·7) years, mean duration of haemodialysis was 5·31 years, mean duration of uremic pruritus was 40·58 (SD 37·8) months and mean intensity of uremic pruritus was mild. The anti‐pruritic effects were significantly larger in subjects treated with either chilled or un‐chilled baby oil than in those who received routine care. Anti‐pruritic effects did not significantly differ between experimental group 1 and experimental group 2. Conclusions. The study confirmed that, for relieving pruritus in haemodialysis patients, either chilled or un‐chilled baby oil is as effective as moisturising lotions and cooling soothing agents. Relevance to clinical practice. Applying baby oil is a simple, safe, inexpensive and easily administered treatment for itchy skin in haemodialysis patients. By preventing or reducing uremic pruritus, baby oil treatment may also improve quality of life in this patient group.

Suggested Citation

  • Tzu‐Chen Lin & Yu‐Hung Lai & Su‐Er Guo & Chin‐Fang Liu & Jer‐Chia Tsai & How‐Ran Guo & Hsin‐Tien Hsu, 2012. "Baby oil therapy for uremic pruritus in haemodialysis patients," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(1‐2), pages 139-148, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:1-2:p:139-148
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03906.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03906.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03906.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ting‐Yin Cheng & Der‐Cherng Tarng & Yuan‐Mei Liao & Pi‐Chu Lin, 2017. "Effects of systematic nursing instruction on a low‐phosphorus diet, serum phosphorus level and pruritus of patients on haemodialysis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3-4), pages 485-494, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:1-2:p:139-148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.