IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i9-10p1319-1328.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An evaluation of hospital hand hygiene practice and glove use in Hong Kong

Author

Listed:
  • Janita P‐C Chau
  • David R Thompson
  • Sheila Twinn
  • Diana TF Lee
  • Sharon WM Pang

Abstract

Aim. To identify omissions in hand hygiene practice and glove use among hospital workers in Hong Kong. Background. Hospital‐acquired infection is the commonest complication affecting hospitalised patients. Even though research evidence suggests that hand hygiene and proper glove use are the most important ways to prevent the spread of disease and infection, compliance with both are reported to be unacceptably low. Design. An observational study of hospital workers in one acute and two convalescence and rehabilitation hospitals in Hong Kong was conducted. The participating clinical areas included the medical and surgical wards, accident and emergency department and intensive care unit. Methods. Hand hygiene practice and glove use amongst 206 hospital health and support workers, stratified according to years of working experience, were observed. Results. The number of observed episodes for hand hygiene was 1037 and for glove use 304. Compliance with hand hygiene was 74·7% and with glove use 72·4%. In approximately two‐third of episodes, participants washed their hands after each patient contact; though, 78·5% failed to rub their hands together vigorously for at least 15 seconds. The major break in compliance with glove use was failure to change gloves between procedures on the same patient. In 28·6% of observed glove use episodes, participants did not wear gloves during procedures that exposed them to blood, body fluids, excretion, non‐intact skin or mucous membranes. Significant differences in performance scores on antiseptic hand rub were found between the two types of hospital and on glove use between the three groups of work experience: ≤5, 6–10, >10 years. Relevance to clinical practice. Education and reinforcement of proper hand hygiene practice and glove use among hospital health and support workers is needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Janita P‐C Chau & David R Thompson & Sheila Twinn & Diana TF Lee & Sharon WM Pang, 2011. "An evaluation of hospital hand hygiene practice and glove use in Hong Kong," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(9‐10), pages 1319-1328, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:9-10:p:1319-1328
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03586.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03586.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03586.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:9-10:p:1319-1328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.