IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i5-6p847-855.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experiences of supernumerary status and the hidden curriculum in nursing: a new twist in the theory–practice gap?

Author

Listed:
  • Helen T Allan
  • Pam Smith
  • Mike O’Driscoll

Abstract

Aims and objectives. This paper aims to increase our understanding about how student nurses’ experiences of supernumerary status are embedded in the hidden curriculum in clinical practice and contribute to the theory–practice gap in nursing. Background. Current literature suggests that the hidden curriculum exists in many professional curricula and that it functions to socialise students into professional behaviours and practice. However, in nursing, there is a gap in our understanding of how these socialisation processes have been influenced by supernumerary status and what forms the hidden curriculum might take currently in clinical practice. Design. An ethnographic case study design. Method. Data were collected in four sites using fieldwork in clinical practice as well as interviews with students, mentors and key stakeholders, an online survey of student bodies and curriculum analysis in four universities. The findings in this paper are drawn from the qualitative fieldwork and interviews and were analysed thematically. Results. The findings suggest that supernumerary status is an important aspect of the hidden curriculum in clinical learning for nursing students; that students are expected by trained staff to work while they learn and that on registration, they are expected to be competent to work immediately as registered nurses. These expectations are at odds with those of academic nurses and contribute to a theory–practice gap for student nurses. These expectations form part of the hidden curriculum that shapes the clinical context, and students have to learn to negotiate their status as supernumerary students in practice to meet these expectations. Conclusion. Consequently, students have to learn in a disintegrated learning context where opposing values of learning exist. Relevance to clinical practice. To reintegrate student nurses’ learning, educators in universities and clinical practice have to understand how the hidden curriculum and expectations around supernumerary status among trained staff affect learning for students.

Suggested Citation

  • Helen T Allan & Pam Smith & Mike O’Driscoll, 2011. "Experiences of supernumerary status and the hidden curriculum in nursing: a new twist in the theory–practice gap?," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(5‐6), pages 847-855, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:5-6:p:847-855
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03570.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03570.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03570.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mark Molesworth & Moira Lewitt, 2016. "Preregistration nursing students’ perspectives on the learning, teaching and application of bioscience knowledge within practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5-6), pages 725-732, March.
    2. Helen T Allan, 2017. "Editorial: The anxiety of caring and the devaluing of nursing," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3-4), pages 299-301, February.
    3. Kiri Hunter & Catherine Cook, 2018. "Role‐modelling and the hidden curriculum: New graduate nurses’ professional socialisation," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(15-16), pages 3157-3170, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:5-6:p:847-855. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.