IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i5-6p828-836.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving student support using Placement Development Teams: staff and student perceptions

Author

Listed:
  • Graham R Williamson
  • Lynne Callaghan
  • Emma Whittlesea
  • Val Heath

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To explore the experience of student support prior to the implementation of a new structure for supporting students and mentors in practice placements (Placement Development Teams) for health care professionals. This study reports findings relating to acute sector adult nursing students and staff. Background. Clinical practice is essential in pre‐registration health care professional education programmes. The English Model National Partnership Agreement for health care education gives a new impetus to Strategic Health Authorities, Higher Education Institutions and National Health Service Trusts to evaluate and redesign their strategies for student support. Design. This study was phase one of a large longitudinal qualitative evaluation of Placement Development Teams’ introduction. The design for this phase was cross‐sectional. Methods. Data were collected using telephone interviews with key educational stakeholders in trusts and Strategic Health Authorities and focus groups with third‐year adult nursing students working in six acute sector trusts. Results. Five themes emerged from the nursing students’ focus group data. These were (1) Supportive and unsupportive behaviour of staff. (2) Mentor allocation. (3) Placement allocation. (4) Benefits of students to the placement area. (5) Perceived control over the learning experience. Four themes emerged from data analysis of the staff telephone interview data. These were (1) Vision of support services. (2) Proactive versus reactive support. (3) Barriers to achieving proactive support. (4) Bridging the gap between education and the trusts. Conclusion. Supporting students in practice is multifaceted and interpersonal and structural factors are important. This study illustrates how student support activity can be redesigned to meet the needs of the Model National Partnership Agreement. Relevance to clinical practice. Good mentoring is particularly important for student support. Where there are high student numbers in placement, this can adversely affect students’ placement learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Graham R Williamson & Lynne Callaghan & Emma Whittlesea & Val Heath, 2011. "Improving student support using Placement Development Teams: staff and student perceptions," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(5‐6), pages 828-836, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:5-6:p:828-836
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03287.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03287.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03287.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Patricia Sheridan & Lucia Carragher & Natacha Carragher & Joe Treacy, 2019. "Development and validation of an instrument to measure stress among older adult nursing students: The Student Nurse Stressor‐15 (SNS‐15) Scale," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(7-8), pages 1336-1345, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:5-6:p:828-836. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.