IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i5-6p615-623.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A review of pain management interventions in bone marrow biopsy

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Watmough
  • Maria Flynn

Abstract

Aims. This review was designed to evaluate the evidence relating to pain management interventions for patients having bone marrow biopsy. Background. Bone marrow biopsy is an invasive procedure causing considerable pain and anxiety for adult patients, yet there are no guidelines to inform effective nursing care. Although this is an under‐researched area, a range of pain interventions have been tested on this patient group, but this evidence has not been synthesised. Design. Structured evidence review. Method. The Cochrane Library and databases Medline, Scopus and Cinahl were searched for original research reports. Reference lists of retrieved papers were hand‐searched and researchers in the field were contacted. Retrieved papers were analysed using the CASP framework. A narrative data synthesis considered the strengths and limitations of included studies and findings were collated and interpreted. Results. No systematic reviews of evidence have been undertaken and the search strategy identified twelve research studies eligible for inclusion in the review. Hand‐searching did not identify any additional studies, and emails to researchers confirmed this is an under‐researched field. Analysis shows three main interventions, intravenous midazolam, premedication with analgesia and/or anxiolysis and the use of Entonox™ are used to manage the pain experience for patients undergoing a bone marrow biopsy. Conclusions. Evidence is inconclusive and provides little guidance for practice. There is an urgent need for research into effective interventions for pain management in bone marrow biopsy and in understanding the patient experience. Relevance to clinical practice. Nurses have a central role to play in the assessment and management of the pain and anxiety associated with bone marrow biopsy. There is little evidence to guide this aspect of care, but it is important that nurses involved with bone marrow biopsy are aware of the best evidence to facilitate the most effective management of their patients’ pain.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Watmough & Maria Flynn, 2011. "A review of pain management interventions in bone marrow biopsy," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(5‐6), pages 615-623, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:5-6:p:615-623
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03485.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03485.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03485.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:5-6:p:615-623. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.