IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i3-4p429-443.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adherence to leg ulcer lifestyle advice: qualitative and quantitative outcomes associated with a nurse‐led intervention

Author

Listed:
  • Ann Van Hecke
  • Maria Grypdonck
  • Hilde Beele
  • Katrien Vanderwee
  • Tom Defloor

Abstract

Aim and objectives. Examining the (experienced) changes associated with a nursing intervention to enhance adherence to leg ulcer lifestyle advice. Background. Few interventions to enhance adherence to leg ulcer treatment are developed and tested. Design. Qualitative evaluation approach and pre–post‐test design were used. Method. Twenty‐six patients with venous ulcers in a community care setting participated. Data were collected by means of interviews and participant observation. Frequency and duration of wearing compression, leg exercising and leg elevation, activity level, pain and ulcer size were registered at baseline, after the end of the intervention and three months later. Inductive content analysis and Wilcoxon signed‐rank test were used. Results. Knowledge about leg ulcer advice increased. The education contributed to more consciously following of the advice. The rationale of the advice and its association with healing or recurrence remained often unclear. More patients performed exercises after the intervention and at follow‐up. Patients often looked out onto a ‘new’ perspective where enhancement of quality of life and even healing might be attainable. Some patients regained independence after learning how to apply and remove compression garments themselves. The frequency of exercising and the duration of exercises increased significantly. Step counts had not altered significantly. Patients not elevating the legs at baseline elevated the legs more and for a longer period of time after the intervention. This effect on leg elevation decreased after three months. No significant changes were reported on hours wearing compression. Conclusions. The perceived changes suggest that the intervention holds a promise for current home care. Combining qualitative and quantitative research assisted to determine the possible effects of the intervention, increasing the potential for a meaningful randomised trial in the future. Relevance to clinical practice. Education about leg ulcer advice should be incorporated in nursing practice. Further testing of the intervention is recommended.

Suggested Citation

  • Ann Van Hecke & Maria Grypdonck & Hilde Beele & Katrien Vanderwee & Tom Defloor, 2011. "Adherence to leg ulcer lifestyle advice: qualitative and quantitative outcomes associated with a nurse‐led intervention," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(3‐4), pages 429-443, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:3-4:p:429-443
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03546.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03546.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03546.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mirna Žulec & Danica Rotar-Pavlič & Zrinka Puharić & Ana Žulec, 2019. "“Wounds Home Alone”—Why and How Venous Leg Ulcer Patients Self-Treat Their Ulcer: A Qualitative Content Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Anusuya Dhar & Judith Needham & Michelle Gibb & Elisabeth Coyne, 2020. "The outcomes and experience of people receiving community‐based nurse‐led wound care: A systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(15-16), pages 2820-2833, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:3-4:p:429-443. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.