Author
Abstract
Aim. The purpose of the study is to examine factors associated with do‐not‐resuscitate orders, do‐not‐hospitalise orders and hospice care in older nursing home residents at admission. Background. Although hospice care is viewed as the ‘gold standard,’ geographic availability and financial reimbursement limits its use. Treatment restriction orders may represent alternative approaches to defining wishes for end‐of‐life care. Design. A descriptive correlational study design was employed to examine the use of four care directives and hospice in newly admitted older people NH residents using Maryland Minimum Data Set 2·0 and the On‐Line Survey Certification and Reporting in 2000. Analyses reflected 10 023 unduplicated admission records from 77 NHs. Results. The prevalence of do‐not‐resuscitate and do‐not‐hospitalise orders at admission was 28 and 3·4%, respectively. A very small percentage of residents received hospice care on admission (1·7%). Appropriately, health‐related characteristics had a strong influence on use of do‐not‐resuscitate orders, do‐not‐hospitalise orders and hospice care. However, identified predictors were varied among do‐not‐resuscitate orders, do‐not‐hospitalise orders and hospice care. Moreover, multivariate logistical modelling found that non‐Medicare insurance significantly influenced the likelihood of do‐not‐resuscitate orders, do‐not‐hospitalise orders and hospice uses; White race increased the likelihood of having a do‐not‐resuscitate and do‐not‐hospitalise order. Treatment restriction orders were associated with an increased of likelihood of hospice use. Conclusions. As policy and reimbursement barriers to hospice use are likely to persist, treatment restriction orders should be used to focus communication with residents, families and providers, with the ultimate goal of more widespread implementation of hospice care principles. Relevance to clinical practice. White race was consistently associated with increasing the likelihood of having do‐not‐resuscitate and do‐not‐hospitalise orders, supporting the importance of cultural sensitivity in advanced care planning. With the association between do‐not‐hospitalise orders and hospice use, treatment restriction orders should be used as potential triggers to prompting end‐of‐life care.
Suggested Citation
Chu‐Yun Lu & Meg Johantgen, 2011.
"Factors associated with treatment restriction orders and hospice in older nursing home residents,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(3‐4), pages 377-387, February.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:3-4:p:377-387
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03346.x
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:3-4:p:377-387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.