IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i3-4p351-358.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using peer mentoring for people with spinal cord injury to enhance self‐efficacy beliefs and prevent medical complications

Author

Listed:
  • Inger Ljungberg
  • Thilo Kroll
  • Alexander Libin
  • Samuel Gordon

Abstract

Aims and objectives. Individuals with spinal cord injury/disease are faced with a myriad of psychosocial adjustment challenges. This article describes the implementation of a peer‐mentoring programme designed to support this adjustment process for people with SCI/disease and the programme’s believed impact on self‐efficacy and prevention of medical complications. Background. With shorter length of stay in acute inpatient rehabilitation after spinal cord injury/disease, peer mentor programmes are becoming an important component to assist with education and community re‐integration. Design. Quasi‐experimental non‐controlled pretest/post‐test. Method. Patients with newly acquired spinal cord injury/disease participated in a one‐ year spinal cord injury peer‐mentoring programme. Peer mentors met with their assigned participants regularly during inpatient care and on discharge to track medical complications and assist with adjusting to life after spinal cord injury/disease. Results. In all, of 37 mentees enrolled, 24 successfully completed the programme. Sixty‐seven per cent showed improved self‐efficacy score between the two time points. Medical complications and doctor visits all decreased significantly between 0–6 months and 7–12 months. Our findings indicate that the older an individual is, the lower the likelihood of having a urinary tract infection (p = 0·006). The programme was well received by all mentees who felt they could connect well with their peer mentor. Conclusion. Peer mentoring in a rehabilitation setting enhances the understanding of challenges that patients and medical staff deal with on a day‐to‐day basis. Our findings suggest it is important to monitor and educate individuals with spinal cord injury/disease at the acute stage to improve medical outcomes. Caution is advised in the interpretation of these results as they were obtained in a small non‐random sample using self‐report data. Relevance to clinical practice. Peer mentors play an increasingly important role in nurse‐delivered education in the spinal cord injury/disease population.

Suggested Citation

  • Inger Ljungberg & Thilo Kroll & Alexander Libin & Samuel Gordon, 2011. "Using peer mentoring for people with spinal cord injury to enhance self‐efficacy beliefs and prevent medical complications," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(3‐4), pages 351-358, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:3-4:p:351-358
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03432.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03432.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03432.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joanne Nicholson & Anne Valentine & Emily Ledingham & Sharon Reif, 2022. "Peer Support at the Intersection of Disability and Opioid (Mis)Use: Key Stakeholders Provide Essential Considerations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-13, August.
    2. Hyoyeon Ahn & Keunchul Lee & Youngho So, 2021. "The Mediating Effect of Disability Acceptance in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury Participating in Sport for All," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-11, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:3-4:p:351-358. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.