IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i23-24p3523-3531.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The use of hermeneutic interpretation statements in EPR documentation to capture qualities of caring

Author

Listed:
  • Gunn von Krogh
  • Dagfinn Nåden

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To present an examination of hermeneutic interpretations statements in documentation; occurrences, nature and significant patterns, before and after the implementation of an electronic patient record and the documentation model quality assurance, problem solving and caring. Background. The problem‐solving and caring model facilitates the systematisation and formatting of nursing documenting in electronic patient record. Text formats are designed for record notes to indicate how the text is to be presented and organised. A narrative text format is designed to facilitate a caring perspective in nursing report notes. This format allows the inclusion of hermeneutic interpretations statements to visualise the understanding of the patient. Design. Documentation material was examined in a pretest–post‐test design. Method. Report notes were analysed with the aid of Gadamer’s hermeneutic interpretation process. The horizon of interpretation was formed by qualities of caring described in caring philosophy and caring theory. Results. One hundred and six reports containing hermeneutic interpretation statements reflecting caring were identified. The finding shows that the number of such information is small and decreases during the project. Conclusion. The result may indicate that hermeneutic interpretation statements in documentation may diminish with the introduction of electronic patient records. This can lead to incomplete information exchange if face‐to‐face reporting is discontinued. For that reason, electronic patient records need an information structure facilitating information formatted to reflect caring. The use of such a format requires training to a larger extent that was offered during this project. Relevance to clinical practice. This study might enhance the clinician’s awareness of materialising both analytical and hermeneutical thinking processes in clinical reasoning when documenting nursing care. New documentation tools and routines might favour documentation based on analytical thinking processes with the consequence that essential information of importance for the individual patient’s care might be lost.

Suggested Citation

  • Gunn von Krogh & Dagfinn Nåden, 2011. "The use of hermeneutic interpretation statements in EPR documentation to capture qualities of caring," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(23‐24), pages 3523-3531, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:23-24:p:3523-3531
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03683.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03683.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03683.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nastasja Robstad & Ulrika Söderhamn & Liv Fegran, 2018. "Intensive care nurses’ experiences of caring for obese intensive care patients: A hermeneutic study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 386-395, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:23-24:p:3523-3531. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.