IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i23-24p3494-3501.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validation of the Brazilian version of the Nursing Work Index‐Revised (B‐NWI‐R)

Author

Listed:
  • Renata C Gasparino
  • Edinêis de Brito Guirardello
  • Linda H Aiken

Abstract

Aims and objective. The goal of this paper was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Nursing Work Index‐Revised – Brazilian version (B‐NWI‐R). Background. Some instruments evaluate the presence of certain characteristics in the professional practice environment of nurses. Among them, the B‐NWI‐R, often cited in the literature and which is examined in the present study. This instrument is composed of 57 items and four subscales: autonomy, control over the work environment, nurse–physician relationships and organisational support. Design. A cross‐sectional research design was carried out in three public university hospitals in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. Methods. The sample was composed of 278 nurses. The reliability of the instrument was evaluated through its homogeneity, using the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. The validity of the subscales of the B‐NWI‐R was evaluated through divergent construct validity and criterion‐related validity. For the divergent construct validity, the Brazilian version of the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) was employed, while for the criterion‐related validity, variables such as ‘satisfaction at work’, ‘perception of quality of care’ and ‘nurses’ intention to leave work in the following year’ were considered. Results. The results showed satisfactory consistency for the total of the items (α = 0·95) and for the subscales of the B‐NWI‐R: ‘control over practice settings’ (α = 0·75); ‘nurse–physician relationships’ (α = 0·75); ‘organisational support’ (α = 0·75) and ‘autonomy’ (α = 0·63). The divergent validity resulted in significant correlation between the adapted instrument subscales and those of the MBI. In addition, a significant correlation was obtained between the subscales of the B‐NWI‐R and the variables ‘perception of quality of care’, ‘satisfaction at work’ and ‘intention to leave work in the following year’. Conclusion. The reliability and validity of the B‐NWI‐R have been established. Relevance to clinical practice. The B‐NWI‐R subscales can be used to assess the nurses’ perceptions of the work environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Renata C Gasparino & Edinêis de Brito Guirardello & Linda H Aiken, 2011. "Validation of the Brazilian version of the Nursing Work Index‐Revised (B‐NWI‐R)," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(23‐24), pages 3494-3501, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:23-24:p:3494-3501
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03776.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03776.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03776.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:23-24:p:3494-3501. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.