IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i23-24p3483-3493.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Moral distress and ethical climate in a Swedish nursing context: perceptions and instrument usability

Author

Listed:
  • Marit Silén
  • Mia Svantesson
  • Sofia Kjellström
  • Birgitta Sidenvall
  • Lennart Christensson

Abstract

Aims and objectives. The aim was fivefold: to describe Swedish nurses’ perceptions of moral distress and determine whether there were differences in perceptions depending on demographic characteristics and to describe the usability of the Moral Distress Scale in a Swedish context. Further, the aim was to describe Swedish nurses’ perceptions of ethical climate and the relationship between moral distress and ethical climate. Background. Moral distress has been studied for more than two decades and the Moral Distress Scale is the most widely used instrument for measuring it. Moral distress has mainly been studied in relation to nurses’ characteristics, but increasing attention has been paid to contextual aspects, such as ethical climate, that could be associated with moral distress. Design. Descriptive, with a quantitative approach. Methods. The study used two questionnaires: the Moral Distress Scale and the Hospital Ethical Climate Survey. The study was carried out at two hospitals in Sweden and included 249 nurses. Results. Both level and frequency of moral distress were low, however level of moral distress was high in situations when the patient was not given safe and proper care. Generally, the frequency of moral distress was lower than the level. Of the situations on the Moral Distress Scale, 13 of the 32 were considered irrelevant by 10–50% of the participants. The more positive the ethical climate was perceived to be, the less frequently morally distressing situations were reported. Conclusions. Since a positive ethical climate was associated with less frequent occurrences of moral distress, it should be investigated what contributes to a positive ethical climate. To be used in a Swedish context, the Moral Distress Scale needs further revision. Relevance to clinical practice. Open dialogues at wards are encouraged regarding what practices contribute to a positive ethical climate.

Suggested Citation

  • Marit Silén & Mia Svantesson & Sofia Kjellström & Birgitta Sidenvall & Lennart Christensson, 2011. "Moral distress and ethical climate in a Swedish nursing context: perceptions and instrument usability," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(23‐24), pages 3483-3493, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:23-24:p:3483-3493
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03753.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03753.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03753.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Georgina Morley, 2018. "What is “moral distress” in nursing? How, can and should we respond to it?," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(19-20), pages 3443-3445, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:23-24:p:3483-3493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.