IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i23-24p3472-3482.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Further psychometric testing of an instrument to measure emotional care in hospital

Author

Listed:
  • Anne M Williams
  • Catherine Pienaar
  • Christine Toye
  • David Joske
  • Leanne Lester

Abstract

Aims and objectives. This paper describes further testing of the instrument Patient Evaluation of Emotional Care during Hospitalisation. Background. In 2005, a questionnaire was developed that could be completed by patients to evaluate the quality of emotional care received during their time in hospital. This questionnaire was tested at an acute care private hospital in Perth, Western Australia, with encouraging estimates of reliability and validity. The purpose of this study was to further test this questionnaire in a larger sample of inpatients at a public hospital in the same state. Design. Psychometric evaluation. Method. A hospital‐wide survey of 13 wards of a public hospital was conducted. Two hundred and fifty‐one patients completed the questionnaire. Results. Psychometric testing of the Patient Evaluation of Emotional Care during Hospitalisation demonstrated acceptable internal consistency reliability. Confirmatory factor analysis substantiated the four sub‐scales as follows: Level of Security, Level of Knowing, Level of Personal Value and Level of Connection. The Level of Connection sub‐scale was assessed for the first time in this study. This sub‐scale had the lowest mean score of all the sub‐scales across the hospital as well as in each of the wards surveyed. Qualitative data substantiated, from the patients’ perspective, a lack of connection with hospital staff. Conclusions. Further psychometric testing of the Patient Evaluation of Emotional Care during Hospitalisation instrument has confirmed its psychometric properties and usefulness as an instrument to measure emotional care during hospitalisation. Relevance to clinical practice. The Patient Evaluation of Emotional Care during Hospitalisation is a reliable and valid tool with which the emotional care of patients in hospital can be measured and the effectiveness of interventions assessed.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne M Williams & Catherine Pienaar & Christine Toye & David Joske & Leanne Lester, 2011. "Further psychometric testing of an instrument to measure emotional care in hospital," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(23‐24), pages 3472-3482, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:23-24:p:3472-3482
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03846.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03846.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03846.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:23-24:p:3472-3482. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.