IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i23-24p3339-3350.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reducing surgical nurses’ aseptic practice‐related stress

Author

Listed:
  • Teija‐Kaisa Aholaakko

Abstract

Aims and objectives. This paper aims to explore aseptic practice‐related stress in surgery. The objectives are to define stress‐related factors and the means to reduce the stress. Background. Occupational stress is related to personal characteristics: job satisfaction and physiological and psychological well‐being. The stress symptoms are often classified as part of a negative mood. Nurses have expressed stress when deadening their conscience to external demands with co‐workers or internal working role‐related demands. Surgery nurses expect fair division of work and compliance with rules. The hospital management, technology and the medical profession, instead of the needs of the patient, are recognised as a danger in the development of surgery nurses’ role. Design. A qualitative stimulated recall interview was performed in the surgery of the university hospital. Methods. Thirty‐one operations were videotaped, and 31 nurses interviewed during videotape stimulation. The 1306 text pages were transcripted and analysed by a qualitative membership categorisation device analysis. Results. The analysis revealed aseptic practice‐related stress which constructed a sixteen level category. The membership categorisation identified connections between qualitatively attributed personnel and seven stress factors: working experience; time; equipment; person; patient; working morals and power. Final analysis revealed nurses reducing aseptic practice‐related stress by safe, peaceful, competent and relative means. Conclusions. The aseptic practice‐related stress varied from positive motivating feelings to exhaustion. The stress was experienced by medical and nursing co‐workers and reduced by means which varied according to expertise and co‐workers. Relevance to clinical practice. This study showed needs for both the shared multiprofessional documentation of aseptic practice and better adherence to recommendations. Constructive means are useful when solving conflicts and replacing person‐related aseptic practice with evidence‐based. They may support nurses’ professional growth, reduce their stress and increase the surgical patient’s safety.

Suggested Citation

  • Teija‐Kaisa Aholaakko, 2011. "Reducing surgical nurses’ aseptic practice‐related stress," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(23‐24), pages 3339-3350, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:23-24:p:3339-3350
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03844.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03844.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03844.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Susanne Friis Søndergaard & Vibeke Lorentzen & Erik Elgaard Sørensen & Kirsten Frederiksen, 2017. "The documentation practice of perioperative nurses: a literature review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(13-14), pages 1757-1769, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:23-24:p:3339-3350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.