IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i21-22p3183-3195.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Attitudes to organ donation among Swedish ICU nurses

Author

Listed:
  • Anne Flodén
  • Lars‐Olof Persson
  • Magnus Rizell
  • Margareta Sanner
  • Anna Forsberg

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To present data on Swedish ICU nurses’ attitudes to brain death and organ donation and to test a questionnaire designed to explore these issues in terms of validity and reliability. Background. Previous studies have identified various barriers to organ donation. The single most important factor was the attitude of ICU staff. Design. A 34‐item instrument was developed to explore attitudes and experiences of organ donation. Method. The questionnaire was sent to 50% of ICU nurses in Sweden (n = 1013) and the response rate was 69% (n = 702). The expected scale dimensionality was examined both by explorative principal component analysis and confirmatory multi‐trait analysis. Scale reliability was further estimated using Cronbach’s alpha. Chi‐squared test was used to compare proportions between ICU specialities and Pearson correlations were calculated to investigate relationships between each of the factors verified and the single items. Results. The main findings were that less than half of the ICU nurses trusted clinical diagnosis of brain death without a confirmatory cerebral angiography. Twenty‐five percent of the respondents indicated that mechanical ventilation was withdrawn to reduce the possible suffering of a person assumed to be clinically dead, without the issue of organ donation being raised. A total of 39% had experienced occasions when the question about organ donation was never raised with the relatives. Four factors were verified and labelled: personal attitudes to organ donation as a situation; Organisational attitudes to organ donation as a phenomenon; Environmental resources; and Personal wish to donate, which accounted for 70% of the variance. Conclusions. Swedish ICU nurses reported several barriers to organ donation. An action plan including education in brain death diagnostics, interpersonal relationships and interaction with relatives as well as regular follow‐up regarding donation issues in various ICU settings would be useful. Relevance to clinical practice. All nurses working in ICUs are obliged to participate in organ donation and are therefore included in these results.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Flodén & Lars‐Olof Persson & Magnus Rizell & Margareta Sanner & Anna Forsberg, 2011. "Attitudes to organ donation among Swedish ICU nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(21‐22), pages 3183-3195, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:21-22:p:3183-3195
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03756.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03756.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03756.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria del Mar Lomero & María F. Jiménez‐Herrera & Maria José Rasero & Alberto Sandiumenge, 2017. "Nurses' attitudes and knowledge regarding organ and tissue donation and transplantation in a provincial hospital: A descriptive and multivariate analysis," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 322-330, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:21-22:p:3183-3195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.