Author
Listed:
- Andrea Driscoll
- Andrew Tonkin
- Andrew Stewart
- David R Thompson
- Linda Worrall‐Carter
- Barbara Riegel
- David L Hare
- Patricia M Davidson
- Simon Stewart
Abstract
Aim. The aim of this study was to develop a potential scoring algorithm for interventions in a chronic heart failure management programme – the Heart Failure Intervention Score – to facilitate quality improvement and programme auditing. Background. The overall efficacy of chronic heart failure management programmes has been demonstrated in several meta‐analyses. However, meta‐analyses did not determine individual interventions in a programme that resulted in beneficial patient outcomes. Design. A prospective cross‐sectional survey design. Method. All chronic heart failure management programmes in Australia (n = 62), identified by a national register, were surveyed to determine programme characteristics and interventions. Results. Of the 62 national chronic heart failure management programmes, 48 (77%) completed the survey and 27 individual interventions were identified. Variability in the use of the key interventions was common among the programmes. Each intervention was given an arbitrary weighted score according to the level of supportive evidence available and a total score calculated. Programmes were then categorised into low or high complexity based on several interventions implemented and their weighted score. A total score of ≥190 (median = 178, interquartile range 176–195) was used to divide programmes into two groups. Nine programmes were categorised into high Heart Failure Intervention Score group and majority of these were based in the acute hospital setting (78%). In the low Heart Failure Intervention Score group, there were 39 programmes of which there were a higher proportion of community‐based programmes (38%) and programmes in small community hospitals (10%). Conclusion. The Heart Failure Intervention Score provides a potential evidence‐based quality improvement tool through which a set of minimum standards can be developed. Implementation of the Heart Failure Intervention Score provides guidance to programme coordinators to enable monitoring of standards of heart failure programmes, which may potentially result in better patient outcomes. Relevance to clinical practice. The Heart Failure Intervention Score is an evidence‐based tool that can be easily used by heart failure programme coordinators to ensure that their programme is evidence‐based, which will improve the quality of their programme and potentially programme outcomes.
Suggested Citation
Andrea Driscoll & Andrew Tonkin & Andrew Stewart & David R Thompson & Linda Worrall‐Carter & Barbara Riegel & David L Hare & Patricia M Davidson & Simon Stewart, 2011.
"Development of an evidence‐based scoring system (HF‐IS) to assess the quality of heart failure programmes for patients postdischarge from hospital,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(21‐22), pages 3011-3019, November.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:21-22:p:3011-3019
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03687.x
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:21-22:p:3011-3019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.