IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i21-22p2997-3010.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A systematic review of the effects of e‐health on chronically ill patients

Author

Listed:
  • Petra Eland‐de Kok
  • Harmieke van Os‐Medendorp
  • Aly Vergouwe‐Meijer
  • Carla Bruijnzeel‐Koomen
  • Wynand Ros

Abstract

Aims and objectives. We aimed to investigate whether e‐health is equal to or better than usual face‐to‐face care with regard to outcomes on health, quality of life, patient satisfaction and costs. Therefore, we systematically reviewed the literature on e‐health in chronically ill patients compared with or as an addition to usual care. Background. Interactive websites on internet are increasingly used to inform and treat patients. This type of contact between patients and health care providers, which is called e‐health, is easily accessible and particularly interesting for chronically ill patients. Design. A systematic review. Methods. We searched the databases PubMed, CINAHL, the Cochrane Database of systematic reviews, DARE and CENTRAL for articles published between January 2000–July 2009. Results. The search strategy yielded in total 695 possibly relevant references, which resulted in 12 RCTs after application of the in‐ and exclusion criteria. Most of the studies were well designed according to the Cochrane criteria for RCTs. The studies are divided into e‐health vs. usual care and e‐health as addition to usual care. e‐Health consisted of monitoring, treatment instructions, self‐management training and general information and communication between patient and caregiver. Most of the studies showed small to moderate positive effects on health outcomes. Cost‐effectiveness, quality of life and patient satisfaction were rarely investigated in the included studies. Conclusions. e‐Health interventions for chronically ill patients, offered instead of usual care or in addition to usual care, lead to small to moderate positive effects on primary health outcomes. However, the evidence was not fully convincing, because of the limited number of studies available and the methodological limitations. Further research is needed to confirm the cost‐effectiveness of e‐health interventions for patients with chronic diseases. Relevance to clinical practice. e‐Health is a promising tool for treatment and self‐management training of chronically ill patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Petra Eland‐de Kok & Harmieke van Os‐Medendorp & Aly Vergouwe‐Meijer & Carla Bruijnzeel‐Koomen & Wynand Ros, 2011. "A systematic review of the effects of e‐health on chronically ill patients," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(21‐22), pages 2997-3010, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:21-22:p:2997-3010
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03743.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03743.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03743.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:21-22:p:2997-3010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.