IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i19-20p2931-2938.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Work ability as a major determinant of clinical nurses’ quality of life

Author

Listed:
  • Milan Milosevic
  • Rajna Golubic
  • Bojana Knezevic
  • Karlo Golubic
  • Marija Bubas
  • Jadranka Mustajbegovic

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To examine quality of life determinants among clinical nurses in Croatia with an emphasis on their work ability. Background. An important personnel management challenge is to explore factors that stimulate or hinder the development of individual work ability and quality of life throughout a career. Design. A cross‐sectional study. Methods. The study was performed during 2007–2008 in six randomly selected hospitals in Croatia. The self‐administered questionnaires included the Work Ability Index (WAI) developed by the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, the Quality of Life questionnaire (WHOQL‐BREF) developed by the World Health Organization and additional socio‐demographic questions. A total number of 1212 nurses completed the questionnaires, giving a response rate of 67.3%. Binary logistic regression was performed to assess how socio‐demographic characteristics and work ability groups predict each of the WHOQL‐BREF domains. Results. Having a satisfactory WAI score (WAI ≥ 37) was significantly the most important predictor for all quality of life domains, with the odds ratios (OR) being as follows: OR = 6.8 (95% CI: 4.8–9.6) for the physical domain, OR = 2.3 (95% CI: 1.7–3.1) for the psychological domain, OR = 1.7 (95% CI: 1.3–2.4) for the social relationship domain and OR = 1.7 (95% CI: 1.3–2.3) for the environmental domain. Conclusions. Satisfactory work ability was a major quality of life determinant in all WHOQL‐BREF domains with the highest odds ratio for the physical domain. Maintaining clinical nurses’ work ability is an important issue, because it is foundational for the quality of life of the workforce. Relevance to clinical practice. Our study provides quantified estimates of the extent to which a satisfactory WAI score predicts a better score in physical, psychosocial, social relationships and environmental domain of nurses’ quality of life. Therefore, maintaining or improving nurses’ work ability remains the essential aim of hospital managers.

Suggested Citation

  • Milan Milosevic & Rajna Golubic & Bojana Knezevic & Karlo Golubic & Marija Bubas & Jadranka Mustajbegovic, 2011. "Work ability as a major determinant of clinical nurses’ quality of life," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(19‐20), pages 2931-2938, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:19-20:p:2931-2938
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03703.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03703.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03703.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:19-20:p:2931-2938. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.