Author
Listed:
- Paula J Laws
- Carylyn Lim
- Sally K Tracy
- Hannah Dahlen
- Elizabeth A Sullivan
Abstract
Background. Approximately 2% of women who give birth in Australia each year do so in a birth centre. A national study on birth centre procedures was conducted in 1997. There have been changes in the management of women in birth centres during the past 10 years and this may be due in part to changes in booking and transfer criteria. Aims. This study aimed to describe booking and transfer criteria and procedures available in birth centres in Australia in 2007 and to compare results with those of a previous national birth centre study undertaken in 1997. Design. Survey. Methods. Questionnaires were sent to 23 birth centres. Questions included: types of procedures, equipment and pain relief available and exclusion criteria for booking and transfer. Of the birth centres, 19 satisfied the inclusion criteria and 16 completed surveys. Results. Changes were noted in booking and transfer criteria and procedures for birth centres between 1997–2007. These included a decline in birth centres accepting postterm pregnancies, vaginal births after caesarean section and women who are obese. There were also reductions in the use of artificial rupture of membranes for augmentation of labour, forceps and opioids. Use of natural therapies was widespread in 2007. Increases in birth centres managing induction of labour and electronic fetal monitoring were also noted. Conclusions. The changes observed in birth centre practice reflect overall changes in maternity care in Australia from 1997–2007. Relevance to clinical practice. Findings of the study suggest that factors such as increasing obesity and limited admission for vaginal births after caesarean section may lead to proportionately more women being unable to access birth centres as their preferred place of birth.
Suggested Citation
Paula J Laws & Carylyn Lim & Sally K Tracy & Hannah Dahlen & Elizabeth A Sullivan, 2011.
"Changes to booking, transfer criteria and procedures in birth centres in Australia from 1997–2007: a national survey,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(19‐20), pages 2812-2821, October.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:19-20:p:2812-2821
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03765.x
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Yu, Serena & Fiebig, Denzil G. & Scarf, Vanessa & Viney, Rosalie & Dahlen, Hannah G. & Homer, Caroline, 2020.
"Birth models of care and intervention rates: The impact of birth centres,"
Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(12), pages 1395-1402.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:19-20:p:2812-2821. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.