Author
Listed:
- Tsae‐Jyy Wang
- Shu‐Chiung Lee
- Shu‐Yuan Liang
- Heng‐Hsin Tung
- Shu‐Fang V Wu
- Yu‐Ping Lin
Abstract
Aims. The study aims to compare changes over time among three study groups on the primary outcome, pain, as well as on the secondary outcomes, other symptoms, activities of daily living function, sport and recreation function, knee‐related quality of life, knee range of motions and the six‐minute walk test and to investigate whether aquatic exercises would be superior compared with land exercise on pain reduction. Background. Osteoarthritis is a prevalent musculoskeletal disorder. Appropriate exercise may prevent osteoarthritis‐associated disabilities and increase life quality. To date, research that compares the effects of different types of exercise for knee osteoarthritis has been limited. Design. The study is a randomised trial. Methods. Eighty‐four participants with knee osteoarthritis were recruited from local community centres. Participants were randomly assigned to the control, aquatic or land‐based exercise group. Exercise in both groups ran for 60 minutes, three times a week for 12 weeks. Data were collected at baseline, week 6 and week 12 during 2006–2007. The instruments included the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, a standard plastic goniometer and the six‐minute walk test. Generalised estimation equations were used to compare changes over time among groups for key outcomes. Results. Results showed statistically significant group‐by‐time interactions in pain, symptoms, sport/recreation and knee‐related quality of life dimensions of Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, knee range of motions and the six‐minute walk test. However, the aquatic group did not show any significant difference from the land group at both weeks 12 and 6. Conclusions. Both aquatic and land‐based exercise programmes are effective in reducing pain, improving knee range of motions, six‐minute walk test and knee‐related quality of life in people with knee osteoarthritis. The aquatic exercise is not superior to land‐based exercise in pain reduction. Relevance to clinical practice. Similar outcomes could be possible with the two programmes. Health care professionals may consider suggesting well‐designed aquatic or land‐based exercise classes for patients with osteoarthritis, based on their preferences and convenience.
Suggested Citation
Tsae‐Jyy Wang & Shu‐Chiung Lee & Shu‐Yuan Liang & Heng‐Hsin Tung & Shu‐Fang V Wu & Yu‐Ping Lin, 2011.
"Comparing the efficacy of aquatic exercises and land‐based exercises for patients with knee osteoarthritis,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(17‐18), pages 2609-2622, September.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:17-18:p:2609-2622
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03675.x
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:17-18:p:2609-2622. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.