IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i17-18p2501-2508.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing quality of nutritional care in Dutch and German nursing homes

Author

Listed:
  • Noémi C van Nie‐Visser
  • Judith MM Meijers
  • Jos MGA Schols
  • Christa Lohrmann
  • Sabine Bartholomeyczik
  • Ruud JG Halfens

Abstract

Aims and objectives. This study investigates possible differences in malnutrition prevalence rates in Dutch and German nursing homes. It seeks to provide insight into the screening, prevention and treatment of malnutrition and the indicators for nutritional care policy. Background. For decades, malnutrition has been an important problem in health care settings worldwide. A considerable percentage of frail older people suffer from malnutrition. In European nursing homes, the reported prevalence rates range widely (2% to 85%). Method. This is a multicentre, cross‐sectional prevalence study of malnutrition in Dutch and German nursing homes using standardised methodology, with the participation of respectively 5848 and 4923 residents (65+ years). Results. Patient characteristics differed significantly between the two countries. Dutch residents were more often male, younger, more care‐dependent and significantly more at risk of malnutrition (31·7%). However, overall malnutrition prevalence rates did not differ significantly (Netherlands 26·8% and Germany 26·5%). All German residents were screened at admission, whereas only 73·1% of the Dutch residents were. As part of screening, nutritional screening tools were used in 38·0% of Dutch and 42·1% of the German residents. A dietician was consulted for 36·7% Dutch and 9·3% German malnourished residents. The proportion of malnourished receiving nutritional intervention was larger in Germany than in the Netherlands. Structural indicators for nutritional policy were fulfilled more often in the Netherlands care at institutional level whereas in Germany they were fulfilled more often at ward level. Conclusion. In this study, German residents had a somewhat better nutritional status than Dutch residents and more is done to enhance nutritional status in German nursing homes. The differences would be somewhat larger if both populations were more comparable. Relevance to clinical practice. Comparing malnutrition prevalence rates, prevention and interventions in health care institutions and countries gives insight into international differences in quality of care.

Suggested Citation

  • Noémi C van Nie‐Visser & Judith MM Meijers & Jos MGA Schols & Christa Lohrmann & Sabine Bartholomeyczik & Ruud JG Halfens, 2011. "Comparing quality of nutritional care in Dutch and German nursing homes," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(17‐18), pages 2501-2508, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:17-18:p:2501-2508
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03761.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03761.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03761.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:17-18:p:2501-2508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.