Author
Listed:
- Maaike AP Janssen
- Theo van Achterberg
- Marian JM Adriaansen
- Caroline S Kampshoff
- Joke Mintjes‐de Groot
Abstract
Aims and objectives. The aim of this study was to evaluate the adherence to the 2004 guideline Triage in emergency departments three years after dissemination in Dutch emergency departments. Background. In 2004, a Dutch guideline Triage in emergency departments was developed. Triage is the first step performed by nurses when a patient arrives at an emergency department. It includes the prioritisation of patients to ensure that doctors see patients with the highest medical needs first. Although the national guideline was developed and disseminated in 2004, three years on there was no insight into the level of implementation of the guideline in practice. Design. A cross‐sectional descriptive design. Methods. In February 2007, data were collected from ward managers and triage nurses at all emergency departments in the Netherlands (n = 108), using a questionnaire that was based on the recommendations and performance indicators of the guideline. Results. In total, 79% of all 108 Dutch emergency departments responded. The main findings showed that over 31% of the emergency departments did not use a triage system. Emergency departments using the Manchester Triage System had a mean adherence rate of 61% of the guideline’s recommendations and emergency departments using the Emergency System Index adhered to a mean of 65%. Conclusion. The guideline Triage in emergency departments was disseminated in 2004, but results from this study indicate that an improvement in adherence to this guideline is required. Relevance to clinical practice. Adherence to guidelines is important to standardise practice to ensure that patients receive the appropriate treatment and to improve quality of care.
Suggested Citation
Maaike AP Janssen & Theo van Achterberg & Marian JM Adriaansen & Caroline S Kampshoff & Joke Mintjes‐de Groot, 2011.
"Adherence to the guideline ‘Triage in emergency departments’: a survey of Dutch emergency departments,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(17‐18), pages 2458-2468, September.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:17-18:p:2458-2468
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03698.x
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:17-18:p:2458-2468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.