IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i15-16p2125-2134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘High‐tech’ home care: overview of professional care in patients on home parenteral nutrition and implications for nursing care

Author

Listed:
  • Getty Huisman‐de Waal
  • Theo van Achterberg
  • Jan Jansen
  • Geert Wanten
  • Lisette Schoonhoven

Abstract

Aim. The aim of this study is to describe the quality, quantity and content of care given to home parenteral nutrition‐dependent patients by various professionals in the Netherlands and to detect potential shortcomings. Background. Home parenteral nutrition is a lifesaving treatment for patients who cannot eat or cannot eat sufficiently. Very little is known about follow‐up care after hospital stay. Yet this is an important aspect of care as patients must cope with high‐tech skills at home. Also, complications and psychosocial complaints can occur. Design. Survey. Methods. A patient questionnaire was used to assess contacts with professionals and possible shortcomings in care. Nursing files from home parenteral nutrition nurses were reviewed for information from all contact moments. Home parenteral nutrition nurses and home care teams were interviewed to assess nursing care and to detect bottlenecks. Results. The nutrition support team was primarily responsible for the home parenteral nutrition care. Physical complaints like abdominal pain or nausea and venous access problems like fever were discussed most often. Patients were satisfied about the nutrition support team, but both the patients and the home parenteral nutrition nurses reported that relatively little attention was paid to psychosocial problems. Furthermore, the included patients visited their General Practitioner 11 times per year on average (range 1–104). Patients experienced a bottleneck with respect to the general practitioner’s knowledge of home parenteral nutrition‐related matters. Conclusion. Home parenteral nutrition patients visit the nutrition support team and their general practitioner most frequently and much attention is paid to medical and physical problems. Psychosocial problems, however, were only discussed in a minority of patients, and this was experienced as a shortcoming. Relevance to clinical practice. Both the patients and the home parenteral nutrition nurses reported that relatively little attention was paid to psychosocial problems. Patients’ concerns must be integrated in contact moments to enhance Quality of Life.

Suggested Citation

  • Getty Huisman‐de Waal & Theo van Achterberg & Jan Jansen & Geert Wanten & Lisette Schoonhoven, 2011. "‘High‐tech’ home care: overview of professional care in patients on home parenteral nutrition and implications for nursing care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(15‐16), pages 2125-2134, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:15-16:p:2125-2134
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03682.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03682.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03682.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:15-16:p:2125-2134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.