IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i13-14p1870-1879.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prospective observational study of postoperative epidural analgesia for major abdominal surgery

Author

Listed:
  • Fiona Duncan

Abstract

Aims. To describe the incidence and intensity of pain, hypotension and other epidural‐related side‐effects after major abdominal surgery and to identify factors associated with effective epidural analgesia. Background. Evidence exists that up to 30% of patients with epidural analgesia still experience severe pain in clinical practice. When epidurals produce good pain relief, potentially harmful side effects can result. Methods. Data were collected prospectively from 480 consecutive general surgical patients in a large District General Hospital in the UK. Results. Fifty‐six per cent of patients were hypotensive on day one. Low pain scores were found to be a predicator for postoperative hypotension. Severe pain was associated with emergency patients, male gender, the absence of hypotension and an epidural that did not continue until planned removal. Significantly lower mean pain scores were found in patients who were 70 years of age and over. No correlation exists between chronic pain before surgery and the level of postoperative pain. Conclusion. This study contributes to the epidural versus standard analgesia debate by describing the population in whom epidurals are used and identifies factors associated with both the success and failure of the technique in everyday practice. The Audit Commission has proposed a standard whereby less than 5% of patients should suffer severe pain following surgery. This may prove to be an unrealistic goal with currently available techniques. Relevance to clinical practice. As it is ward nursing staff who are primarily responsible for monitoring the effectiveness of the technique, it is important for nursing professionals to know the potential risks of postoperative epidural analgesia to be able to respond appropriately. The important measurements of an optimum acute pain assessment have been identified, based on the study results, allowing the development of a national acute pain registry to inform future practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Fiona Duncan, 2011. "Prospective observational study of postoperative epidural analgesia for major abdominal surgery," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(13‐14), pages 1870-1879, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:13-14:p:1870-1879
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03752.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03752.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03752.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:13-14:p:1870-1879. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.