IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i13-14p1858-1869.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A pain education programme to improve patient satisfaction with cancer pain management: a randomised control trial

Author

Listed:
  • Pi‐Ling Chou
  • Chia‐Chin Lin

Abstract

Aim. The purpose of this study was (1) to evaluate the effectiveness of a pain education programme to increase the satisfaction of patients with cancer with regard to pain management and (2) to examine how patient satisfaction with pain management mediates the barriers to using analgesics and analgesic adherence. Background. The patients' satisfaction with pain management is not merely an indicator, it is actually a contributor to medication adherence. However, very few studies investigate methods for improving patient satisfaction with pain management. Design. This study used an experimental and longitudinal design. Methods. A total of 61 patient–family pairs (n = 122) were randomly assigned to either experimental or control groups. The instruments included the American Pain Society outcome questionnaire, the Barriers Questionnaire‐Taiwan form, self‐reporting evaluations of analgesic adherence and the Pain Education Booklet. The experimental group (n = 31) participated in a pain education programme, while those in the control group (n = 30) did not. The two groups were compared using generalised estimation equations after the second and fourth weeks. A Sobel test was used to examine the mediating relationships among patient satisfaction with pain management, barriers to using analgesics and analgesic adherence. Results. The experimental group showed a significant improvement in the level of satisfaction they felt for physicians and nurses regarding pain management. For those in the experimental group, satisfaction with pain management was a significant mediator between barriers to using analgesics and analgesic adherence. Conclusions. This research provides evidence supporting the effectiveness of a pain education programme for patients and their family members in increasing patient satisfaction with regard to the management of cancer pain. Relevance to clinical practice. It is important for health providers to consider patient satisfaction when attempting to improve adherence to pain management regimes in a clinical setting.

Suggested Citation

  • Pi‐Ling Chou & Chia‐Chin Lin, 2011. "A pain education programme to improve patient satisfaction with cancer pain management: a randomised control trial," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(13‐14), pages 1858-1869, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:13-14:p:1858-1869
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03740.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03740.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03740.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:13-14:p:1858-1869. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.