IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i13-14p1834-1841.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality of end‐of‐life care for non‐cancer patients in a non‐acute hospital

Author

Listed:
  • Jean Woo
  • Raymond Lo
  • Joanna OY Cheng
  • Florens Wong
  • Benise Mak

Abstract

Aims and objectives. Few surveys have been carried out documenting the quality of life for non‐cancer patients in general district hospitals reaching the final trajectory towards death. We carried out a survey of 80 patients facing the final stages of their chronic illness as well as their carers and hospital staff. Background. With increasing life expectancy, a large majority of patients are older, where palliative care principles for patients with cancer are equally applicable. Few surveys have been carried out documenting the quality of life for non‐cancer patients in general district hospitals reaching the final trajectory towards death in terms of patients’ and carers’ perspective, compared with the more extensive literature for patients with cancer. Design. Survey. Methods. Assessment tools include symptom check list, geriatric depression scale, Chinese Death Anxiety Inventory and the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire for patients; SF‐12 and the Chinese cost of care index for informal carers; and the Chinese Maslach Bumout and Death Anxiety Inventories for hospital staff. Results. Lower‐limb weakness (92·5%), fatigue (86·2%), oedema (85%), dysphagia (58·2%) and pain (48·8%) were the most common symptoms in this group of patients. The mean Chinese Caregiver Stress Index score was 45·93 (SD 6·45) (maximum score = 80). For staff, the mean SF‐12 physical component score was lower than the Hong Kong population average. Conclusion. The findings suggest that there is room for improvement in the quality of end‐of‐life care. Relevance to clinical practice. Patients in the final stages of many chronic illnesses have high prevalence of symptoms comparable to those of patients with cancer. Raising awareness and improving training for all health care professionals, formulating guidelines and care pathways and incorporating quality of care as key performance indicators are measures to improve the quality of end‐of‐life care.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean Woo & Raymond Lo & Joanna OY Cheng & Florens Wong & Benise Mak, 2011. "Quality of end‐of‐life care for non‐cancer patients in a non‐acute hospital," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(13‐14), pages 1834-1841, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:13-14:p:1834-1841
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03673.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03673.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03673.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:13-14:p:1834-1841. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.