IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i11-12p1640-1650.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Patient Care Delivery Model – an open system framework: conceptualisation, literature review and analytical strategy

Author

Listed:
  • Linda O’Brien‐Pallas
  • Raquel M Meyer
  • Laureen J Hayes
  • Sping Wang

Abstract

Aims and objectives. This paper presents the Patient Care Delivery Model to illustrate interrelationships between model components and to support its application in research using advanced analytical techniques, including structural equation modelling. Background. Many complex factors contribute to the nature of healthcare environments and to nurse, patient and system outcomes. A better understanding of these factors and their interrelationships would provide insight for decision‐makers to develop strategies to improve outcomes. Design. A literature review approach was used to address the objectives. Method. A threefold approach used existing theory to explicate a comprehensive conceptual framework, reviewed empirical studies of the proposed relationships and considered the application of advanced analytical techniques to inform future research directions. Results. As per general system theory, inputs (patient, nurse and system characteristics) to the Patient Care Delivery Model interact with throughputs (nursing interventions, work environments and environmental complexity) to produce intermediate (staffing levels) and distal outputs (patient, nurse and system outcomes). Application of the model in research and its relevance for healthcare settings is supported in the current literature. Statistical techniques that allow model testing and the investigation of multiple relationships simultaneously have demonstrated the interconnections among the model components. Conclusions. Development of the Patient Care Delivery Model is a step towards understanding work environments and providing healthcare managers with evidence‐based management tools. Formal testing of comprehensive, multilevel conceptual models will provide empirical linkages between inputs and outputs and will identify potential mediators between predictors and outcomes to offer new insight into organisational practices. Relevance to clinical practice. A better understanding of how factors in the work environment impact clinical outcomes can facilitate care processes in the nursing unit. Future studies using comprehensive conceptual frameworks and sophisticated analytical approaches will enhance professional nursing practice and improve clinical outcomes in healthcare organisations.

Suggested Citation

  • Linda O’Brien‐Pallas & Raquel M Meyer & Laureen J Hayes & Sping Wang, 2011. "The Patient Care Delivery Model – an open system framework: conceptualisation, literature review and analytical strategy," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(11‐12), pages 1640-1650, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:11-12:p:1640-1650
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03391.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03391.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03391.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ann Rhéaume & Sophie Dionne & Denise Gaudet & Monique Allain & Estelle Belliveau & Laurraine Boudreau & Laurianne Brown, 2015. "The changing boundaries of nursing: a qualitative study of the transition to a new nursing care delivery model," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(17-18), pages 2529-2537, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:11-12:p:1640-1650. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.