IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i11-12p1613-1622.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validation of the Chinese version of the Functional Performance Inventory Short Form in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Author

Listed:
  • Ai‐Min Guo
  • Jiang‐Na Han
  • Nancy Kline Leidy
  • Zheng‐Lai Wu
  • Ping Wang
  • Ying‐Xiang Lin

Abstract

Aims and objective. To determine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Functional Performance Inventory Short Form (FPI‐SF‐C) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Beijing, China. Background. The Functional Performance Inventory Short Form (FPI‐SF) is a 32‐item instrument designed to measure self‐reported functional performance of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This instrument had not been translated into Mandarin Chinese and tested for use in mainland China. Design. Cross‐sectional validation study with a two‐week test of reproducibility. Method. The FPI‐SF was translated using forward and backward translation procedures and administered to 108 stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients from outpatient clinics of three hospitals in Beijing, China. Pulmonary function and six‐minute walking distance (6‐MWD) tests were performed on the same day or within one week before the FPI‐SF‐C completion. Thirty of the patients participated in the reproducibility assessment. Results. Cronbach’s alpha for the FPI‐SF‐C total score was 0·89; subscales ranged from 0·70 (Body Care)–0·89 (Spiritual activities). Test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient) was 0·93 with subscales ranging from 0·73 (Body Care)–0·96 (Household Maintenance). No ceiling or floor effects were observed for total FPI‐SF‐C score. Total scores correlated significantly (p

Suggested Citation

  • Ai‐Min Guo & Jiang‐Na Han & Nancy Kline Leidy & Zheng‐Lai Wu & Ping Wang & Ying‐Xiang Lin, 2011. "Validation of the Chinese version of the Functional Performance Inventory Short Form in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(11‐12), pages 1613-1622, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:11-12:p:1613-1622
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03623.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03623.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03623.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:11-12:p:1613-1622. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.