IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i11-12p1542-1552.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

KUD – a scale for clinical evaluation of moderate‐to‐severe dementia

Author

Listed:
  • Iréne Ericsson
  • Bo Malmberg
  • Sven Langworth
  • Anders Haglund
  • Ann‐Helene Almborg

Abstract

Aim. To develop a test of cognitive performance in persons with moderate‐to‐severe dementia. Background. Various instruments are used to assess the course of dementia and to evaluate treatments in persons with dementia. Most neuropsychological assessments are inappropriate for measuring cognitive abilities in persons with severe dementia, because these persons perform at floor level in such measurements. Design. A cross‐sectional research design. Methods. The test (Clinical Evaluation of Moderate‐to‐Severe Dementia; Swedish acronym: KUD) was developed from a pool of 25 test items with the final KUD consisting of 15 items. Reliability and validity were established using 220 subjects (with various dementia diagnoses) with scores of Mini‐Mental State Examination between 0–20. Approximately two weeks after the first test, 116 of the original 220 subjects were retested. Results. A factor analysis with the 15‐item scale revealed an interaction factor comprising three items and a cognitive performance factor with 12 items. The internal consistence reliability was 0·93 for the KUD (Cronbach’s alpha). Test–retest reliability was also high (0·92) and correlation between the KUD and the MMSE (≤20) was high (r = 0·80). Conclusion. The KUD seems to be a valid, reliable performance‐based assessment scale for measuring cognitive performance in persons with MMSE score below 12 or 15 points. Relevance to clinical practice. It is of outmost interest that cognitive performance can be easily followed for persons with moderate‐to‐severe dementia in, for example, drug therapies and other therapies, but also in terms of treatment of and support to the person based on his or her abilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Iréne Ericsson & Bo Malmberg & Sven Langworth & Anders Haglund & Ann‐Helene Almborg, 2011. "KUD – a scale for clinical evaluation of moderate‐to‐severe dementia," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(11‐12), pages 1542-1552, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:11-12:p:1542-1552
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03619.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03619.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03619.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:11-12:p:1542-1552. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.